I have a sourceware.org account, but can not correlate the account with
Bugzilla login.
Just want to assign a tracker to someone.
Thanks,
Feng
From: Jonathan Wakely
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2019 7:07 PM
To: Feng Xue OS
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject:
On Tue, 2019-12-10 at 13:42 -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-12-10 at 12:51 -0700, Martin Sebor wrote:
> > On 12/10/19 10:56 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2019-12-10 at 09:36 -0700, Martin Sebor wrote:
> > > > On 12/10/19 8:46 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
> > > > > For the adventurous/cur
Georg-Johann Lay writes:
> Hi, doesn't actually anybody know know to make memory more expensive
> than registers when it comes to allocating registers?
>
> Whatever I am trying for TARGET_MEMORY_MOVE_COST and
> TARGET_REGISTER_MOVE_COST, ira-costs.c always makes registers more
> expensive than
Jonathan Wakely :
> That's good news and I'm relieved to hear it. Thanks.
Defect resolution has sped up noticeably since jsm28 and rearnsha
showed up on #reposurgeon and started working directly with my crew.
Relax. As Joseph reported, we've got this well in hand now. We might
even have a final
Jonathan Wakely :
> My concern is that there is no conversion done using reposurgeon that
> *can* be used to do correctness checks.
We can in fact verify revisions of a GCC conversion in place using
repotool compare. Joseph Myers has been using this with reposurgeon's
readlimit to run tests.
Unfo
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Monday, December 9, 2019 12:36 PM, GT wrote:
> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
> On Monday, December 9, 2019 3:39 AM, Richard Biener
> richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > > I'm modifying the code trying to get complex double accepted as a valid
> > > typ
On Wed, 11 Dec 2019 at 15:36, Joseph Myers wrote:
>
> On Wed, 11 Dec 2019, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
>
> > On 11/12/2019 15:19, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > > On Wed, 11 Dec 2019 at 15:03, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
> > >> I wouldn't bother with that. There are known defects in the versi
On 11/12/2019 15:30, Dennis Luehring wrote:
> the differences between Maxim and Erics final result will hopefully show
> the open bugs in both tools
> and allow fixing - i think this compare phase is needed if the result
> should be the best possible
>
I don't disagree. But I don't think it's as
On Wed, 11 Dec 2019, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
> On 11/12/2019 15:19, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > On Wed, 11 Dec 2019 at 15:03, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
> >> I wouldn't bother with that. There are known defects in the version of
> >> reposurgeon that I used to produce that which have
the differences between Maxim and Erics final result will hopefully show
the open bugs in both tools
and allow fixing - i think this compare phase is needed if the result
should be the best possible
Am 11.12.2019 um 16:19 schrieb Jonathan Wakely:
On Wed, 11 Dec 2019 at 15:03, Richard Earnshaw (l
On 11/12/2019 15:19, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Dec 2019 at 15:03, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
>> I wouldn't bother with that. There are known defects in the version of
>> reposurgeon that I used to produce that which have since been fixed. It
>> was *never* the point of that upload
On Wed, 11 Dec 2019 at 15:03, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
> I wouldn't bother with that. There are known defects in the version of
> reposurgeon that I used to produce that which have since been fixed. It
> was *never* the point of that upload to ask for correctness checks on
> the conversion
On 11/12/2019 14:40, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
>> On Dec 9, 2019, at 9:19 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 6 Dec 2019, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
>>
>>> Reposurgeon has been used for several major conversions, including groff
>>> and Emacs. I don't mean to be nasty to Maxim, but I have not yet seen
> On Dec 9, 2019, at 9:19 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
>
> On Fri, 6 Dec 2019, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
>
>> Reposurgeon has been used for several major conversions, including groff
>> and Emacs. I don't mean to be nasty to Maxim, but I have not yet seen
>> *anybody* who thought they could get the j
Hi,
Hope you are doing well.
We are following up to if you would be interested in the attendee list of
The Trophex Show
12 - 13 Jan 2020
NEC, Birmingham, UK
Count =10,500
Our company provides the following details regarding your attendees: Client
Name, Title, Email address, Phone number, Websi
On Wed, 11 Dec 2019 at 02:25, Feng Xue OS wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I want to alter some information of an existing Bugzilla tracker, such as
> assignee, but found there is no entrance in page of the Bugzilla tracker to
> do this. How can I get it?
Usually that's restricted to GCC developers, using
16 matches
Mail list logo
