Hi,
I want to alter some information of an existing Bugzilla tracker, such as
assignee, but found there is no entrance in page of the Bugzilla tracker to do
this. How can I get it?
Thanks,
Feng
Hello,
I am trying to understand how to store information in object files
during LTO.
Is it possible to write arbitrary data in these sections?
There's not a lot of documentation about the specifics I need in the GCC
Internals.
I have made a simple LTO pass that writes
* "Hello world\n" into an
> On Mon, 2019-12-09 at 17:59 -0500, Erick Ochoa wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > this is an update on the LTO pass we've been working on. The
> > optimization is called ipa-initcall-cp because it propagates constant
> > values written to variables with static lifetimes (such as ones
> > initialized in i
On Mon, 2019-12-09 at 17:59 -0500, Erick Ochoa wrote:
> Hello,
>
> this is an update on the LTO pass we've been working on. The
> optimization is called ipa-initcall-cp because it propagates constant
> values written to variables with static lifetimes (such as ones
> initialized in initialization
On Tue, 2019-12-10 at 12:51 -0700, Martin Sebor wrote:
> On 12/10/19 10:56 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
> > On Tue, 2019-12-10 at 09:36 -0700, Martin Sebor wrote:
> > > On 12/10/19 8:46 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
> > > > For the adventurous/curious, my static analyzer branch of GCC
> > > > [1]
> > > > is
Hi, doesn't actually anybody know know to make memory more expensive
than registers when it comes to allocating registers?
Whatever I am trying for TARGET_MEMORY_MOVE_COST and
TARGET_REGISTER_MOVE_COST, ira-costs.c always makes registers more
expensive than mem and therefore allocates values t
On 12/10/19 10:56 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
On Tue, 2019-12-10 at 09:36 -0700, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 12/10/19 8:46 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
For the adventurous/curious, my static analyzer branch of GCC [1]
is
now available on Compiler Explorer (aka godbolt.org) so you can try
it
out without bui
On Tue, 2019-12-10 at 09:36 -0700, Martin Sebor wrote:
> On 12/10/19 8:46 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
> > For the adventurous/curious, my static analyzer branch of GCC [1]
> > is
> > now available on Compiler Explorer (aka godbolt.org) so you can try
> > it
> > out without building it yourself. [Than
On Tue, 2019-12-10 at 12:11 -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-12-10 at 11:04 -0500, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 10:46:59AM -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> [...]
> > > Would it make sense to add an "analyzer" component to our
> > > bugzilla,
> > > even though this is stil
On Tue, 2019-12-10 at 11:04 -0500, Marek Polacek wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 10:46:59AM -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
[...]
> > Would it make sense to add an "analyzer" component to our bugzilla,
> > even though this is still on a branch? (with me as default
> > assignee)
>
> I think so, we hav
On 12/10/19 8:46 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
For the adventurous/curious, my static analyzer branch of GCC [1] is
now available on Compiler Explorer (aka godbolt.org) so you can try it
out without building it yourself. [Thanks to Matt Godbolt, Patrick
Quist and others at the Compiler Explorer proje
On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 10:46:59AM -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> For the adventurous/curious, my static analyzer branch of GCC [1] is
> now available on Compiler Explorer (aka godbolt.org) so you can try it
> out without building it yourself. [Thanks to Matt Godbolt, Patrick
> Quist and others at
For the adventurous/curious, my static analyzer branch of GCC [1] is
now available on Compiler Explorer (aka godbolt.org) so you can try it
out without building it yourself. [Thanks to Matt Godbolt, Patrick
Quist and others at the Compiler Explorer project]
On https://godbolt.org/ within the C an
On Tue, 10 Dec 2019 at 06:22, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 10:14 PM li zi wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> > We are using gcc in our projects and we found some of the C standard
> > functions (like memcpy, strcpy) used in gcc may induce security
> > vulnerablities like buffer overflo
14 matches
Mail list logo
