I am interested in posting on your blog…https://gcc.gnu.org/

2019-11-05 Thread samra malik
Hi! > I am interested in posting on your blog… https://gcc.gnu.org/ > need to know some things in advance before I include your site in my > offer:1. Final and flat best rates per post. > 2. Type of links (dofollow). > 3. Do you accept easy writing article > 4. Donot add disclosures/sponsored tags

Re: Commit messages and the move to git

2019-11-05 Thread Segher Boessenkool
Hi! On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 09:50:37AM -0500, David Malcolm wrote: > FWIW my convention has been to put "[PATCH]" in the email subject line > for patches I want reviewed, and "[committed]" for patches that I've > already self-approved (or are obvious) and thus don't need review. And there is [RFC

Re: Commit messages and the move to git

2019-11-05 Thread Richard Earnshaw (lists)
On 05/11/2019 02:51, Kewen.Lin wrote: > Hi, > > on 2019/11/4 下午6:29, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: >> With the move to git fairly imminent now it would be nice if we could agree >> on a more git-friendly style of commit messages; and, ideally, start using >> them now so that the converted repo

Re: Commit messages and the move to git

2019-11-05 Thread Richard Earnshaw (lists)
On 05/11/2019 14:12, Marek Polacek wrote: > On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 11:27:50AM +, Jason Merrill wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 11:07 AM Jonathan Wakely >> wrote: >>> On Mon, 4 Nov 2019 at 17:42, Joseph Myers wrote: On Mon, 4 Nov 2019, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > On Mon, Nov 04

Re: Commit messages and the move to git

2019-11-05 Thread Iain Sandoe
Segher Boessenkool wrote: > On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 11:07:05AM +, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >> On Mon, 4 Nov 2019 at 17:42, Joseph Myers wrote: >>> I've been using git-style commit messages in GCC for the past five years. >> >> I think I only started four years ago :-) > > I amr210190

Re: Commit messages and the move to git

2019-11-05 Thread Segher Boessenkool
On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 11:07:05AM +, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On Mon, 4 Nov 2019 at 17:42, Joseph Myers wrote: > > I've been using git-style commit messages in GCC for the past five years. > > I think I only started four years ago :-) I amr210190 Wed May 7 22:00:58 2014 + Josep

Re: GCC 7.5 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org

2019-11-05 Thread Bill Seurer
On 11/5/19 6:45 AM, Richard Biener wrote: The first release candidate for GCC 7.5 is available from https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/7.5.0-RC-20191105/ and shortly its mirrors. It has been generated from SVN revision 277823. I have so far bootstrapped and tested the release candidate

Re: Feedback request on how best to handle recursion in concept satisfaction

2019-11-05 Thread Jason Merrill
On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 2:42 PM Jeff Chapman wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 8:03 AM Nathan Sidwell wrote: > > Why doesn't the std specify the satisfaction nesting limit in the same > > way as template instantiation? (at least that's what I infer from your > > question). > > I'm not sure why it'

Re: Commit messages and the move to git

2019-11-05 Thread Richard Earnshaw
On 04/11/2019 16:04, Jeff Law wrote: > On 11/4/19 3:29 AM, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: >> With the move to git fairly imminent now it would be nice if we could >> agree on a more git-friendly style of commit messages; and, ideally, >> start using them now so that the converted repository can be

Re: Commit messages and the move to git

2019-11-05 Thread David Malcolm
On Tue, 2019-11-05 at 11:27 +, Jason Merrill wrote: > On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 11:07 AM Jonathan Wakely < > jwakely@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, 4 Nov 2019 at 17:42, Joseph Myers wrote: > > > On Mon, 4 Nov 2019, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 04:19:25PM +000

Re: Feedback request on how best to handle recursion in concept satisfaction

2019-11-05 Thread Jeff Chapman
On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 8:03 AM Nathan Sidwell wrote: > Why doesn't the std specify the satisfaction nesting limit in the same > way as template instantiation? (at least that's what I infer from your > question). I'm not sure why it's not explicitly listed along with the template instantiation lim

Re: Commit messages and the move to git

2019-11-05 Thread Marek Polacek
On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 11:27:50AM +, Jason Merrill wrote: > On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 11:07 AM Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > On Mon, 4 Nov 2019 at 17:42, Joseph Myers wrote: > > > On Mon, 4 Nov 2019, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 04:19:25PM +, Jonathan Wakely w

GCC 7.5 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org

2019-11-05 Thread Richard Biener
The first release candidate for GCC 7.5 is available from https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/7.5.0-RC-20191105/ and shortly its mirrors. It has been generated from SVN revision 277823. I have so far bootstrapped and tested the release candidate on {x86_64,i586,ppc64le,s390x,aarch64

Re: Commit messages and the move to git

2019-11-05 Thread Jason Merrill
On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 11:07 AM Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On Mon, 4 Nov 2019 at 17:42, Joseph Myers wrote: > > On Mon, 4 Nov 2019, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 04:19:25PM +, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > > > I've already proposed a more specific format for libstdc++:

Re: Commit messages and the move to git

2019-11-05 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On Mon, 4 Nov 2019 at 17:42, Joseph Myers wrote: > > On Mon, 4 Nov 2019, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 04:19:25PM +, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > > I've already proposed a more specific format for libstdc++: > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2019-09/msg00122.html >