Feedback request on how best to handle recursion in concept satisfaction

Hello, I'm seeking feedback on how best to handle deep or infinite recursion in concept satisfaction. Please let me know if there's a better place to ask. Recursion in satisfaction can occur a few ways, some of which has been fixed by moving the point of declaration of a concept to prevent direct

RE: COTS:[urgent]: [External]:Information required on security-related patches under Free Software Foundation

Hi Jonathan, Thank you for the information. Could you please provide me the point of contact from whom I can get the version details and updates. Thanks and Stay Secure, Dhanalakshmi Kumar Vulnerability Management Tata Consultancy Services | Contracted to Honeywell Desk:        +91-6746778032

Re: COTS:[urgent]: [External]:Information required on security-related patches under Free Software Foundation

On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 at 13:02, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 at 12:15, Kumar, Dhanalakshmi > wrote: > > > > Hi Team, > > > > > > > > Could you please provide the latest market version for the Application (as > > mentioned in the below table) > > > > > > > > Business Application N

Re: COTS:[urgent]: [External]:Information required on security-related patches under Free Software Foundation

On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 at 12:15, Kumar, Dhanalakshmi wrote: > > Hi Team, > > > > Could you please provide the latest market version for the Application (as > mentioned in the below table) > > > > Business Application Name > > Honeywell Version Installed > GNU COMPILER COLLECTION > gcc-8 (SUSE Linux)

COTS:[urgent]: [External]:Information required on security-related patches under Free Software Foundation

Hi Team, Could you please provide the latest market version for the Application (as mentioned in the below table) Business Application Name Honeywell Version Installed GNU COMPILER COLLECTION gcc-8 (SUSE Linux) 8.2.1 20180831 [gcc-8-branch revision 264010] Is there any security fixes ava

Re: GCC selftest improvements

On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 11:12 PM Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 03:41:13PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > > On 10/28/19 2:27 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 01:40:03PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > > >> On 10/25/19 6:01 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: > > >>> Ja

Re: GCC selftest improvements

On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 10:47 PM Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 03:41:13PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > > On 10/28/19 2:27 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 01:40:03PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > > >> On 10/25/19 6:01 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: > > >>> Jason,