Re: [gcc 10-20190728] internal compiler error: in speculative_call_info, at cgraph.c:1114

2019-07-29 Thread Sergey Senozhatsky
On (07/30/19 14:12), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > On (07/29/19 09:42), Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > Please don't cross-post to te gcc@ and gcc-bugs@ lists, that's never > > appropriate. > > So is top-posing ;) D'oh... s/posing/posting/ Will keep in mind next time that gcc team prefers bugzilla.

Re: [gcc 10-20190728] internal compiler error: in speculative_call_info, at cgraph.c:1114

2019-07-29 Thread Sergey Senozhatsky
On (07/29/19 09:42), Jonathan Wakely wrote: > Please don't cross-post to te gcc@ and gcc-bugs@ lists, that's never > appropriate. So is top-posing ;) > The gcc@ list is not for reporting bugs, and the > gcc-bugs@ list is for automated emails sent from our Bugzilla > database, also not for reporti

Re: Expansion of narrowing math built-ins into power instructions

2019-07-29 Thread Segher Boessenkool
Hi! On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 07:37:53PM +0200, Martin Jambor wrote: > as you might know, Tejas is our Google Summer of Code student working on > adding built-in functions for some new math functions added in ISO/IEC > TS 18661. > > His next step is to expand "functions rounding result to narrower

Expansion of narrowing math built-ins into power instructions

2019-07-29 Thread Martin Jambor
Hi Segher, as you might know, Tejas is our Google Summer of Code student working on adding built-in functions for some new math functions added in ISO/IEC TS 18661. His next step is to expand "functions rounding result to narrower type" (so fadd, fsub and possibly fmul and fdiv described in http:

Re: [GSoC-19] Implementing narrowing functions like fadd

2019-07-29 Thread Martin Jambor
Hi, On Sat, Jul 27 2019, Tejas Joshi wrote: > Hello. > >>> You'll need something different from CASE_MATHFN - these are a different >>> kind of functions that need handling in a different way, because they are >>> parametrized over certain *pairs* of types, rather than over a single >>> type. >> f

Re: Disappeared flag: -maes on -march=ivybridge, present in -march=native

2019-07-29 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Sunday, 28 July 2019 16:16:21 PDT Kevin Weidemann wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I have recently randomly discovered the fact, that building with > `-march=ivybridge` does not necessarily produce the same output as > `-march=native` on an Intel Core i7 3770K (Ivy Bridge). > > In particular, `-ma

Re: [gcc 10-20190728] internal compiler error: in speculative_call_info, at cgraph.c:1114

2019-07-29 Thread Jonathan Wakely
Please don't cross-post to te gcc@ and gcc-bugs@ lists, that's never appropriate. The gcc@ list is not for reporting bugs, and the gcc-bugs@ list is for automated emails sent from our Bugzilla database, also not for reporting bugs. To report a bug please see https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/ Thanks. On M