Hi Florian,
On Fri, Jul 05, 2019 at 07:49:21AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > We already have an option for that (-Werror=implicit-function-declaration),
> > and it is an error by default with -pedantic-errors already. If you are
> > asking to make it an error by default, I second that; there n
* Segher Boessenkool:
> On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 01:27:27PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> Implicit function declarations were removed from C99, more than twenty
>> years ago. So far, GCC only warns about them because there were too
>> many old configure scripts where an error would lead to incor
On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 11:39 PM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 10:40:15AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > I think fully guaranteeing this is hard (besides when you use
> > > volatile), we have the very same issue when dealing with
> > > pointer provenance rules, known for yea
Snapshot gcc-7-20190704 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/7-20190704/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 7 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcc-7
On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 01:27:27PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Implicit function declarations were removed from C99, more than twenty
> years ago. So far, GCC only warns about them because there were too
> many old configure scripts where an error would lead to incorrect
> configure check failu
On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 10:40:15AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > I think fully guaranteeing this is hard (besides when you use
> > volatile), we have the very same issue when dealing with
> > pointer provenance rules, known for years and not fixed
> > (and I don't see a good way to fix these i
On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 01:00:18PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 6:33 PM Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 05:47:56PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > On July 3, 2019 5:14:58 PM GMT+02:00, "Paul E. McKenney"
> > > wrote:
> > > >On Wed, Jul 03, 2019
Hi all,
The 8th HelloLLVM / HelloGCC social in China will happen on July 20, 2019.
The location is at Hangzhou.
Everyone interested in LLVM/GCC Toolchain related projects is invited to join.
Event details is at https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/qK9V62atBpXyTKNP_J7A8Q
Presentations are welcome :-)
Cu
Implicit function declarations were removed from C99, more than twenty
years ago. So far, GCC only warns about them because there were too
many old configure scripts where an error would lead to incorrect
configure check failures.
I can try to fix the remaining configure scripts in Fedora and sub
I'm running into some issues building LTO+profiled enabled configurations in
some constrained build environment called buildds, having four cores and 16GB of
RAM.
configured for all frontends (maximum number of LTO links) and configured with
--enable-bootstrap \
--with-build-config=bootstrap-
On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 6:33 PM Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 05:47:56PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On July 3, 2019 5:14:58 PM GMT+02:00, "Paul E. McKenney"
> > wrote:
> > >On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 12:39:41AM +0530, Akshat Garg wrote:
> > >> On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 8:40
11 matches
Mail list logo
