On 6/24/19 11:42 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 4:35 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
On 6/24/19 6:11 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 7:17 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
On 6/21/19 6:06 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 5:15 AM Martin Sebor wrote:
Bug
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 04:55:17AM +0900, 김규래 wrote:
> I'm not very familiar with the gomp plugin system.
> However, looking at 'GOMP_PLUGIN_target_task_completion' seem like tasks have
> to go in and out of the runtime.
> In that case, is it right that the tasks have to know from which queue they
Hi,
I'm not very familiar with the gomp plugin system.
However, looking at 'GOMP_PLUGIN_target_task_completion' seem like tasks have
to go in and out of the runtime.
In that case, is it right that the tasks have to know from which queue they
came from?
I think I'll have to add the id of the corre
On 2019-06-24 8:59 a.m., Giuliano Belinassi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Parallelize GCC with Threads -- First Evaluation
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I am attaching the first evaluation report here publicly for gathering
> feedback. The file is in markdown format and it can be easily be converted to
> PDF for b
On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 3:31 PM Martin Liška wrote:
>
> On 6/24/19 2:44 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 2:12 PM Martin Liška wrote:
> >>
> >> On 6/24/19 2:02 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 4:01 PM Martin Liška wrote:
>
> On 6/21/19 2:57 PM
Hello everyone,
We are working on the project to not allow memory_order_consume gets
automatically promoted to memory_order_acquire. In implementing
memory_order_consume, the problem comes when tracing dependencies at the
C/C++ source level. We are first targeting to trace the dependencies only
fo
On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 4:35 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
>
> On 6/24/19 6:11 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 7:17 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
> >>
> >> On 6/21/19 6:06 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 5:15 AM Martin Sebor wrote:
>
> Bug 90923 shows th
> From: Martin Liška
> Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2019 9:49 AM
> I see. What about the following patch:
>
> $ ./gcc/xgcc -Bgcc /tmp/main.c --coverage -fprofile-note=/tmp/main.gcno $
> ls -l /tmp/main.gcno
> -rw-r--r-- 1 marxin users 428 Jun 20 15:48 /tmp/main.gcno
Thanks. That did the trick.
Nex
On 6/24/19 6:11 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 7:17 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
On 6/21/19 6:06 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 5:15 AM Martin Sebor wrote:
Bug 90923 shows that even though GCC hash-table based containers
like hash_map can be instantiated on
> On 24 Jun 2019, at 14:31, Martin Liška wrote:
>
> On 6/24/19 2:44 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 2:12 PM Martin Liška wrote:
>>>
>>> On 6/24/19 2:02 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 4:01 PM Martin Liška wrote:
>
> On 6/21/19 2:57 PM, Jan
On 6/24/19 2:44 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 2:12 PM Martin Liška wrote:
>>
>> On 6/24/19 2:02 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 4:01 PM Martin Liška wrote:
On 6/21/19 2:57 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> This looks like good step (and please stre
Hi,
Parallelize GCC with Threads -- First Evaluation
Hi everyone,
I am attaching the first evaluation report here publicly for gathering
feedback. The file is in markdown format and it can be easily be converted to
PDF for better visualization.
I am also open to suggestions and ideas in order t
On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 2:12 PM Martin Liška wrote:
>
> On 6/24/19 2:02 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 4:01 PM Martin Liška wrote:
> >>
> >> On 6/21/19 2:57 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> >>> This looks like good step (and please stream it in host independent
> >>> way). I suppos
On 6/24/19 2:02 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 4:01 PM Martin Liška wrote:
>>
>> On 6/21/19 2:57 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>>> This looks like good step (and please stream it in host independent
>>> way). I suppose all these issues can be done one-by-one.
>>
>> So there's a worki
On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 7:17 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
>
> On 6/21/19 6:06 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 5:15 AM Martin Sebor wrote:
> >>
> >> Bug 90923 shows that even though GCC hash-table based containers
> >> like hash_map can be instantiated on types with user-defined ct
On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 4:01 PM Martin Liška wrote:
>
> On 6/21/19 2:57 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > This looks like good step (and please stream it in host independent
> > way). I suppose all these issues can be done one-by-one.
>
> So there's a working patch for that. However one will see followin
On Fri, 21 Jun 2019 at 16:28, Iain Sandoe wrote:
>
> Hi Christophe,
>
> we’ve been looking at some cases where Darwin tests fail or pass unexpectedly
> depending on
> options. It came as a surprise to see it failing a test for shared support
> (since it’s always
> supported shared libs).
>
> --
17 matches
Mail list logo