On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 05:02:53PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 6/2/19 6:28 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 01, 2019 at 11:41:30PM +, Fredrik Hederstierna wrote:
> >> +(define_peephole2
> >> + [(set (match_operand:SI 0 "arm_general_register_operand" "")
> >> + (match_operand
On 6/2/19 6:28 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 01, 2019 at 11:41:30PM +, Fredrik Hederstierna wrote:
>> +(define_peephole2
>> + [(set (match_operand:SI 0 "arm_general_register_operand" "")
>> + (match_operand:SI 1 "arm_general_register_operand" ""))
>> + (set (reg:CC CC_REG
On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 08:49:39PM +0100, Jozef Lawrynowicz wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Jun 2019 11:49:21 -0500
> Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > The documentation says
> >
> > '-pedantic' and other options cause warnings for many GNU C extensions.
> > You can prevent such warnings within one expression
After the various discussions, I've evaluated how I think everything can
fit together, so this is my proposal for integration with trunk.
The complete Ranger prototype consists of 5 major components, one of
which is missing/un-implemented as yet :-)
1 - irange - This is the non-symboli
On Wed, Jun 5, 2019 at 10:42 PM 김규래 wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 5, 2019 at 9:25 PM 김규래 wrote:
>
> >
> > > Hi, thanks for the detailed explanation.
> > > I think I now get the picture.
> > > Judging from my current understanding, the task-parallelism currently
> works as follows:
> > > 1. Tasks are pl
On Wed, 5 Jun 2019 11:49:21 -0500
Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 02:25:59PM +0100, Jozef Lawrynowicz wrote:
> > I'm assuming it would not be valid to modify the behaviour of __extension__
> > so it can be placed within a declaration, and not just at the
> > beginning. However
> On Wed, Jun 5, 2019 at 9:25 PM 김규래 wrote:
>
> > Hi, thanks for the detailed explanation.
> > I think I now get the picture.
> > Judging from my current understanding, the task-parallelism currently works
> > as follows:
> > 1. Tasks are placed in a global shared queue.
> > 2. Workers consume t
On Wed, Jun 5, 2019 at 9:25 PM 김규래 wrote:
>
> Hi, thanks for the detailed explanation.
> I think I now get the picture.
> Judging from my current understanding, the task-parallelism currently works
> as follows:
> 1. Tasks are placed in a global shared queue.
> 2. Workers consume the tasks by bas
On Thu, Jun 06, 2019 at 03:25:24AM +0900, 김규래 wrote:
> Hi, thanks for the detailed explanation.
> I think I now get the picture.
> Judging from my current understanding, the task-parallelism currently works
> as follows:
> 1. Tasks are placed in a global shared queue.
It isn't a global shared qu
Hi, thanks for the detailed explanation.
I think I now get the picture.
Judging from my current understanding, the task-parallelism currently works as
follows:
1. Tasks are placed in a global shared queue.
2. Workers consume the tasks by bashing the queue in a while loop, just as
self-scheduling
On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 02:25:59PM +0100, Jozef Lawrynowicz wrote:
> I'm assuming it would not be valid to modify the behaviour of __extension__
> so it can be placed within a declaration, and not just at the
> beginning. However, there is minimal documentation on this keyword (it does
> not
> sta
Greetings,
It appears that the given sha512 sum for gcc-7.4.0.tar.gz may be incorrect
on at least the following mirrors:
http://mirrors.concertpass.com/
http://www.netgull.com/
https://bigsearcher.com/
Regards,
Farid Parpia IBM Corporation: 710-2-RF28, 2455 South Road,
Poughk
The MSP430 target in the large memory model uses the (non-ISO) __int20 type for
SIZE_TYPE and PTRDIFF_TYPE.
The preprocessor therefore expands a builtin such as __SIZE_TYPE__ to
"__int20 unsigned" in user code.
When compiling with the "-pedantic-errors" flag, the use of any of these
builtin macros
Hello.
Following patch is tested on following test cases in the testsuite and
tests did not fail. I have considered most of the test cases this time
hopefully.
/* { dg-do link } */
extern int link_error (int);
#define TEST(FN, VALUE, RESULT) \
if (__builtin_##FN (VALUE) != RESULT) link_error (
On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 9:55 PM Andrew MacLeod wrote:>
> On 6/4/19 1:07 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On June 4, 2019 6:50:07 PM GMT+02:00, Andrew MacLeod
> > wrote:
> >> On 6/4/19 11:37 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> >>
> >>> where the single(!) query of the range of i on the alloca call
> >>> will
15 matches
Mail list logo
