I should have taken all the test cases into consideration. Fool of me. I
will try to make changes taking all the test cases into consideration along
with the testsuite.
Thanks.
On Wed, 8 May 2019 at 02:31, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Wed, 8 May 2019, Tejas Joshi wrote:
>
> > Hello.
> > As per my un
On 2019-05-07 5:04 p.m., Andrew MacLeod wrote:
> On 5/7/19 2:40 PM, nick wrote:
>> Andrew,
>>
>> I read through your notes briefly on this issue and if you want help I'm
>> game for it.
>> I assuming it's fixed not through as the gcc projects pages tend to me out
>> of date in
>> my experience
On 5/7/19 2:40 PM, nick wrote:
Andrew,
I read through your notes briefly on this issue and if you want help I'm game
for it.
I assuming it's fixed not through as the gcc projects pages tend to me out of
date in
my experience.
Nick
Yeah, very old project and not really on the radar any more :
On Wed, 8 May 2019, Tejas Joshi wrote:
> Hello.
> As per my understanding, 3.5 would be represented in GCC as follows :
> r->uexp = 2
> and
> r->sig[2] = 11100 in binary 64 bit. (first 2 bits being 3 and
> following 10000 being 0.5, which later only happens for halfway cases)
> So, if
Hello.
Thanks for your inputs.
If it is meant to be testing whether a value is halfway between two
integers, there are two things you need to test. You need to test whether
the bit with value 0.5 is 0 or 1 (which this function doesn't seem to
test) - and you also need to test whether *all* bits b
Andrew,
I read through your notes briefly on this issue and if you want help I'm game
for it.
I assuming it's fixed not through as the gcc projects pages tend to me out of
date in
my experience.
Nick
Hi everyone,
Thanks for accepting my proposal Implementing OpenMP Work Stealing Scheduling
for GSoC 2019.
I'll do my best to accomplish the proposed goals.
Right now the semester hasn't ended so progress would be limited.
However, I'll start working on the project as soon as the semester ends.
Dur
On Sat, 4 May 2019, Tejas Joshi wrote:
> Hello.
> Taking the notes from Joseph under consideration, I have developed a
> fairly working patch for roundeven, attached herewith.
There are several issues here. One key one is that you haven't added any
testcases to the GCC testsuite. I'd expect te
On Mon, 6 May 2019, Giuliano Belinassi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 03/29, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Thu, 28 Mar 2019, Giuliano Belinassi wrote:
> >
> > > Hi, Richard
> > >
> > > On 03/28, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 2:55 PM Giuliano Belinassi
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > >
I finally understand what i did wrong! i`m just recompile gcc into one folder,
and use binaries from another because of mistake in folder while configure
re-make, of course it did not work, just lost two weeks and bother two
wonderful people!!! thank to you all very much!! and sorry for my eng
On Tue, May 07, 2019 at 10:47:40AM +0200, FX wrote:
> >> Those are certainly exported from my GCC 9 libgomp.so.1.0.0 (at least on
> >> Linux but I don't see how it could not be elsewhere).
>
> I can confirm they are present.
>
> The issue I am having is indeed due to GCC 9 trying to link against
Update on this issue:
>> Those are certainly exported from my GCC 9 libgomp.so.1.0.0 (at least on
>> Linux but I don't see how it could not be elsewhere).
I can confirm they are present.
The issue I am having is indeed due to GCC 9 trying to link against the wrong
library: it turns out that LLV
On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 7:31 PM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 01:02:40PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > Hi Jakub!
> >
> > On Tue, 30 Apr 2019 12:56:52 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 12:47:54PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > > > Email to apparen
PING^1
On 3/11/19 1:12 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
> Hi.
>
> For a test-case like:
>
> ───┬─
>│ File: test.cpp
> ───┼─
>1 │ template
>2 │ T
>3 │ abs(T x) {
>4 │ if (x < 0) {
>5 │
14 matches
Mail list logo
