Snapshot gcc-9-20190407 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/9-20190407/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 9 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk revision
Hello There,
I am very eager to participate in GSoC 2019 and am interested in the idea
to add new functions to math.h and complex.h.
I wanted to know that can i apply i this project.
P.S. I've already uploaded my proposal.
Hello There,
I very eager to participate in GSoC 2019 and am interested in the idea to
add new functions to math.h and complex.h.
I wanted to know that can i apply i this project.
P.S. I've already uploaded my proposal.
Hi Richard,
I don't know without looking, but I'd start at assemble_variable in varasm.c.
Thanks. I've done that, and this is what a patch could look like.
However, I will not have time to formally submit this until next
weekend.
In the meantime, comments are still welcome :-)
Regards
On 2019-04-07 5:31 a.m., Richard Biener wrote:
> On April 5, 2019 6:11:15 PM GMT+02:00, nick wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2019-04-05 6:25 a.m., Richard Biener wrote:
>>> On Wed, 3 Apr 2019, nick wrote:
>>>
On 2019-04-03 7:30 a.m., Richard Biener wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Apr 2019, nick wrote:
On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 5:37 PM Martin Liška wrote:
> On 4/4/19 1:44 PM, Shubham Narlawar wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 2:13 PM Martin Liška wrote:
> >
> >> On 4/3/19 6:31 PM, Martin Jambor wrote:
> >>> Hello Shubham,
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Mar 29 2019, Shubham Narlawar wrote:
> Hi, here is
On April 5, 2019 6:11:15 PM GMT+02:00, nick wrote:
>
>
>On 2019-04-05 6:25 a.m., Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Wed, 3 Apr 2019, nick wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2019-04-03 7:30 a.m., Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, 1 Apr 2019, nick wrote:
>
>
> On 2019-04-01 9:47 a.m., Richard Bien
On April 6, 2019 3:59:41 PM GMT+02:00, Thomas Koenig
wrote:
>Am 05.04.19 um 12:15 schrieb Richard Biener:
>
>> Putting readonly data into .rodata isn't required by the C standard I
>think
>> so we could freely choose .bss for data exceeding a reasonable
>> size limit.
>
>That would be the best so
Hi ,
While working I just figured out that -Wconversion is buggy. Please see the
below code- -
$ cat b.c
#include
void main (void)
{
//contains build errors
uint16_t x = 1;
uint16_t y = 2;
y += x; /* contains error */
}
$ gcc b.c -Wconversion
b.c: In function
