On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 06:32:32AM +, senthilkumar.selva...@microchip.com
wrote:
> Segher Boessenkool writes:
> > On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 09:39:52AM +,
> > senthilkumar.selva...@microchip.com wrote:
> >> When debugging PR 88253, I found that force_to_mode uses a parameter
> >> (just_s
Segher Boessenkool writes:
> Hi!
>
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 09:39:52AM +, senthilkumar.selva...@microchip.com
> wrote:
>> When debugging PR 88253, I found that force_to_mode uses a parameter
>> (just_select) to prevent the function from returning a const0_rtx even
>> if none of the b
Snapshot gcc-7-20181213 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/7-20181213/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 7 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcc-7
Greetings All,
I seem to have probably traced this bug down but am not sure what is the best
way
to fix it being new here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88395#add_comment
Seems the issue is in va_heap::reserve in vec.h as we aren't checking if v is
equal to N like in vaheap::rel
Hi!
On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 09:39:52AM +, senthilkumar.selva...@microchip.com
wrote:
> When debugging PR 88253, I found that force_to_mode uses a parameter
> (just_select) to prevent the function from returning a const0_rtx even
> if none of the bits set by the rtx are needed. The comme
On 12/12/18 15:05 -0500, nick wrote:
On 2018-12-12 10:24 a.m., Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 12/12/18 17:17 +0200, Ville Voutilainen wrote:
On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 at 17:14, nick wrote:
> I think there's an attempt to ascertain that mostly constructors and
> assignment operators need noexcept-fixe
Hi,
When debugging PR 88253, I found that force_to_mode uses a parameter
(just_select) to prevent the function from returning a const0_rtx even
if none of the bits set by the rtx are needed. The comment says
"If JUST_SELECT is nonzero, don't optimize by noticing that bits in MASK
are
On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 11:46 PM Giuliano Augusto Faulin Belinassi
wrote:
>
> Hi, I have some news. :-)
>
> I replicated the Martin Liška experiment [1] on a 64-cores machine for
> gcc [2] and Linux kernel [3] (Linux kernel was fully parallelized),
> and I am excited to dive into this problem. As
