On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 6:10 PM Jeff Law wrote:
>
> On 11/28/18 10:00 AM, Michael Eager wrote:
> > I have a small test case which generates poor quality code on my target.
> > Here is the original:
> >
> > if (cond1 == 2048 || cond2 == 8)
> > {
> > x = x + y;
> > }
> > return x;
Greetings All,
I assume you get lots of these but I was wondering what's the
areas where gcc needs help the most these days that are good
for a new developer to gcc. The only other question I have
is the gcc internal manual here up to date for gcc 8 or
not?
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gccint
On 11/29/18 04:24, Richard Biener wrote:
A release candidate for GCC 7.4 is available from
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/7.4.0-RC-20181129/
and shortly its mirrors. It has been generated from SVN revision 266611.
I have so far bootstrapped and tested the release candidate on
x86_64
Snapshot gcc-7-20181129 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/7-20181129/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 7 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcc-7
On 11/28/18 14:37, Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 9:47 AM Michael Eager wrote:
On 11/28/18 09:10, Jeff Law wrote:
On 11/28/18 10:00 AM, Michael Eager wrote:
I have a small test case which generates poor quality code on my target.
Here is the original:
if (cond1 == 2048 ||
On 11/28/18 9:07 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 11/27/18 11:57 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 11/26/18 3:37 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 11/23/18 12:31 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
GCC currently accepts the declaration of f0 below but ignores
the attribute. On aarch64 (and I presume on other targets with
a default
On 11/21/18 9:33 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 10:07:35AM -0800, Michael Eager wrote:
>> The internal RTL should not be dictating what the target arch can or
>> cannot implement. Reload should insert any needed conversions,
>> especially ones which narrow the size.
>
>
On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 08:46:34PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> But, I'd like to ask if x86 people want to keep this macros.s approach.
> Revert 77b0bf55bc675 right now
> assuming the compiler will eventually solve the issue?
Yap, considering how elegant the compiler solution is and how much
pr
A release candidate for GCC 7.4 is available from
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/7.4.0-RC-20181129/
and shortly its mirrors. It has been generated from SVN revision 266611.
I have so far bootstrapped and tested the release candidate on
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Please test it and
