Cced maintainer like David Edelsohn and Segher Boessenkool .
Any suggestions/comments for the below query ?
Thank you
~Umesh
On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 9:23 PM Umesh Kalappa wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> For the below code (test.c)
>
> int foo()
> {
> printf("Hello World");
> }
>
> On linux :
> ccpc -mcp
In my target (pdp11) which has 16 bit words, I see some test suite failures
because of unresolved references to __cmpsi2. The strange thing is that most
of the time 32 bit compares are expanded by GCC into a sequence of word
compares and branches.
Why would GCC sometimes generate library calls
Snapshot gcc-7-20181025 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/7-20181025/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 7 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcc-7
I have a question about process_bb_lives and check_pseudos_live_through_calls.
I am trying to optimize aarch64 vector functions, which do not partially
clobber vector registers the way that 'normal' functions do. To do this
I am looking at modifying the hard_regno_call_part_clobbered target
funct
On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 7:12 AM Umesh Kalappa wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> For the below C code
>
> Test.u32pt = u32PtLen;
> Test.u32pn = u32PtCnt;
> Test.pstpk = pstPt;
> Test.psteo = pstEgrInfo;
> Test.e = 1;
> Test.pstfi = pstFi ;
>
> return foo(&Test, AclAction);
>
>
On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 05:32:56PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Oct 2018 at 10:54, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >
> > Status
> > ==
> >
> > The 6.5 branch is now frozen for the final GCC 6.5 release, the release
> > candidate has been announced. All changes to the branch require RM
>
On Fri, 19 Oct 2018 at 10:54, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> Status
> ==
>
> The 6.5 branch is now frozen for the final GCC 6.5 release, the release
> candidate has been announced. All changes to the branch require RM
> approval.
Since the branch was frozen I was made aware of two libstdc++
regres
On 10/25/2018 01:31 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
On Okt 24 2018, Martin Sebor wrote:
Is there a way to include a reference to a specific option
from within a .info file rather than to the section/node
the option is defined in?
You can add an @anchor.
Thanks. After adding the @anchor I can us
Hi All,
For the below code (test.c)
int foo()
{
printf("Hello World");
}
On linux :
ccpc -mcpu=e6500 -mno-altivec -mabi=no-altivec -D_WRS_HARDWARE_FP
-mabi=elfv2 -mcmodel=med -mhard-float -S test.c
linux asm :
the constant string fetched like
addis 3,2,.LC0@toc@ha
addi 3,3,.LC0@toc@l
wher
Hi All,
For the below C code
Test.u32pt = u32PtLen;
Test.u32pn = u32PtCnt;
Test.pstpk = pstPt;
Test.psteo = pstEgrInfo;
Test.e = 1;
Test.pstfi = pstFi ;
return foo(&Test, AclAction);
where "Test" is the struct type .
the generated code for mips (with -fno-dela
On Okt 24 2018, Martin Sebor wrote:
> Is there a way to include a reference to a specific option
> from within a .info file rather than to the section/node
> the option is defined in?
You can add an @anchor.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8
11 matches
Mail list logo
