On Oct 10, 2018, Rich Felker wrote:
> It's recently come up in musl libc development that the tlsdesc asm
> functions, at least for some archs, are potentially not future-proof,
> in that, for a given fixed version of the asm in the dynamic linker,
> it seems possible for a future ISA level and c
I have a doloop_end pattern in pdp11.md which looks like this:
(define_insn_and_split "doloop_end"
[(set (pc)
(if_then_else
(ne (match_operand:HI 0 "nonimmediate_operand" "+r,!m")
(const_int 1))
(label_ref (match_operand 1 "" ""))
(pc)))
(set (m
Snapshot gcc-6-20181010 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/6-20181010/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 6 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcc-6
Hi,
Hope you are having a great day!
I am glad to know that you are exhibiting at TechNet Asia-Pacific - AFCEA
2018. I wanted to let you know that we have the current attendee list of
3,870 contacts for TechNet Asia-Pacific - AFCEA 2018.
We would provide the contact information includi
It's recently come up in musl libc development that the tlsdesc asm
functions, at least for some archs, are potentially not future-proof,
in that, for a given fixed version of the asm in the dynamic linker,
it seems possible for a future ISA level and compiler supporting that
ISA level to produce c
On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 11:39 PM Paul Koning wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jul 17, 2018, at 9:36 AM, Richard Biener
> > wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 3:08 PM Paul Koning wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> On Jul 17, 2018, at 5:46 AM, Richard Biener
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> ...
> >>>
> >>> There is not eno
