Hi Matt,
[timings]
Intel AVX2:
C_SW 1.4931
D_SW 5.4254
PG_D 1.0878
TRACER_2D 24.7418
REMAPPING 27.2644
Now I looked at GNU Fortran (7.3.0). Here my "stock" flags are quite
boring (and all flags, not just the optimization ones):
[Various options elided,
Snapshot gcc-6-20180418 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/6-20180418/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 6 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcc-6
Hi Jakub!
As has been discussed in the
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2017-02/msg00041.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-05/msg01227.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-04/msg00810.html
threads and in
https://gcc.gnu.org/PR81084
the powerpc*-*-*spe* support which has been split i
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 3:34 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 12:30:03PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Wed, 18 Apr 2018, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>>
>> > Hello!
>> >
>> > Currently, CET is enabled by default for linux if target supports
>> > multi-byte NOPs and if assembler suppor
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 12:30:03PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Apr 2018, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>
> > Hello!
> >
> > Currently, CET is enabled by default for linux if target supports
> > multi-byte NOPs and if assembler supports CET insn. Effectively, with
> > newer binutils, CET suppor
On Wed, 18 Apr 2018, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Currently, CET is enabled by default for linux if target supports
> multi-byte NOPs and if assembler supports CET insn. Effectively, with
> newer binutils, CET support is an opt-out feature.
>
> I don't think this should be the case, and I pro
Hello!
Currently, CET is enabled by default for linux if target supports
multi-byte NOPs and if assembler supports CET insn. Effectively, with
newer binutils, CET support is an opt-out feature.
I don't think this should be the case, and I propose to consider CET
as an opt-in feature. Multi-byte N
As has been discussed in the
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2017-02/msg00041.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-05/msg01227.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-04/msg00810.html
threads and in
https://gcc.gnu.org/PR81084
the powerpc*-*-*spe* support which has been split into a separat
On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 3:54 PM, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> On 10/04/18 14:27, Richard Biener wrote:
>>
>> On April 10, 2018 3:06:55 PM GMT+02:00, Jakub Jelinek
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 02:55:43PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
I wonder if it is possible for glibc to ship a "