Hi Richard
Please let me know if you have any knowledge about compiler used to this
project
I had some info they use gnu compiler before the change name sincerley chris
http://www.samsung.com/global/business/telecommunication-systems/resource/opensource/ip-set-top-box.html
SMT-6010E SMT-601
Snapshot gcc-7-20180125 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/7-20180125/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 7 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcc-7
Hi,
As I understand from this
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/ARM-Options.html current master
branch doesn't have support of double-precision FPv5 floating-point
instructions for ARMv8-R (Cortex-r52).
If yes, are there any chances to see them in GCC 8 ?
Alex
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 2:23 AM, Milian Wolff wrote:
>
> I was made aware that libbacktrace got support for external debug info with
> [1], great work! I have just synced the latest libbacktrace into heaptrack [2]
> in a local branch and played around with it and noticed two limitations:
>
> [1]:
On 01/25/2018 06:38 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 4:21 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> I tried this:
>>
>> struct C {
>> virtual ~C();
>> virtual void f();
>> };
>>
>> void
>> f (C *p)
>> {
>> p->f();
>> p->f();
>> }
>>
>> with r256939 and -mindirect-branch=thunk -O2 on x86-64
You've just sent that to hundreds of people who can't unsubscribe you.
Read the SMTP headers of the email, or go to
https://gcc.gnu.org/lists.html and follow the instructions there.
On 25 January 2018 at 14:56, Jimmy Shen wrote:
> unsubscribe
>
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 4:41 AM, Richard Biener
unsubscribe
On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 4:41 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> The GNU Compiler Collection version 7.3 has been released.
>
> GCC 7.3 is a bug-fix release from the GCC 7 branch
> containing important fixes for regressions and serious bugs in
> GCC 7.2 with more than 99 bugs fixed since t
Am 2018-01-12 um 19:45 schrieb Jeff Law:
On 01/12/2018 11:26 AM, Cory Fields wrote:
Quick disclaimer: I'm 100% new to GCC code and the dev process, so
there are bound to be some faulty assumptions below.
I recently worked on a build of gcc, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu ->
x86_64-pc-linux-musl. In order
On 01/25/2018 02:38 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 12:32 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 01/22/2018 01:21 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
There is a different issue with the think itself.
__x86_indirect_thunk_rax:
.LFB2:
.cfi_startproc
call.LIND5
.LIND4:
On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 12:32 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 01/22/2018 01:21 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>
>> There is a different issue with the think itself.
>>
>> __x86_indirect_thunk_rax:
>> .LFB2:
>> .cfi_startproc
>> call.LIND5
>> .LIND4:
>> pause
>> lf
On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 4:21 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> I tried this:
>
> struct C {
> virtual ~C();
> virtual void f();
> };
>
> void
> f (C *p)
> {
> p->f();
> p->f();
> }
>
> with r256939 and -mindirect-branch=thunk -O2 on x86-64 GNU/Linux, and got
> this:
>
> _Z1fP1C:
> .LFB0:
>
Thank you!
On 25 Jan 2018 1:16 pm, "Jonathan Wakely" wrote:
> Read the SMTP headers of the email, or go to
> https://gcc.gnu.org/lists.html and follow the instructions there.
>
> On 25 January 2018 at 10:48, Vikrant Abbott
> wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > I don't know how to unsubscribe to this.
> >
> >
Read the SMTP headers of the email, or go to
https://gcc.gnu.org/lists.html and follow the instructions there.
On 25 January 2018 at 10:48, Vikrant Abbott wrote:
> Hi
>
> I don't know how to unsubscribe to this.
>
> Thanks.
> Vik.
>
> On 25 Jan 2018 9:48 am, "Richard Biener" wrote:
>
>>
>> The G
On 25 January 2018 at 12:29, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 25 January 2018 at 12:27, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
>> On 22.01.2018 16:20, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>>
>>> On 21 January 2018 at 12:08, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
Jay K schrieb:
>
>
> extern const int foo = 123;
>
> W
On 25 January 2018 at 12:27, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
> On 22.01.2018 16:20, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>
>> On 21 January 2018 at 12:08, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
>>>
>>> Jay K schrieb:
extern const int foo = 123;
Why does this warn?
This is a valid portable form, with the
On 22.01.2018 16:20, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 21 January 2018 at 12:08, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
Jay K schrieb:
extern const int foo = 123;
Why does this warn?
This is a valid portable form, with the same meaning
across all compilers, and, importantly, portably
to C and C++.
I also wondered
Hi
I don't know how to unsubscribe to this.
Thanks.
Vik.
On 25 Jan 2018 9:48 am, "Richard Biener" wrote:
>
> The GNU Compiler Collection version 7.3 has been released.
>
> GCC 7.3 is a bug-fix release from the GCC 7 branch
> containing important fixes for regressions and serious bugs in
> GCC
Status
==
The GCC 7 branch is again open for regression and documentation fixes.
Quality Data
Priority # Change from last report
--- ---
P1
P2 164 + 2
P3 22 + 9
P4 1
The GNU Compiler Collection version 7.3 has been released.
GCC 7.3 is a bug-fix release from the GCC 7 branch
containing important fixes for regressions and serious bugs in
GCC 7.2 with more than 99 bugs fixed since the previous release.
This release includes code generation options to mitigate
On 01/22/2018 01:21 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
There is a different issue with the think itself.
__x86_indirect_thunk_rax:
.LFB2:
.cfi_startproc
call .LIND5
.LIND4:
pause
lfence
jmp .LIND4
.LIND5:
mov %rax, (%rsp)
ret
20 matches
Mail list logo