On 2017/12/4 10:25, carl hansen wrote:
line 12 , you say "void A( );"
say instead:
void A(){};
That solved it for me, using gcc7.2
Yeah, I miss the implementation, but I did this on purpose
I'm curious is there any options to eliminate this.
like gcc -O2 do.
thanks.
line 12 , you say "void A( );"
say instead:
void A(){};
That solved it for me, using gcc7.2
On Sun, Dec 3, 2017 at 4:56 PM, chengjian (D) wrote:
> I have written a simple code like this
>
> ```c
> #include
> #include
>
> //#define CONFIG_TARGET_X86_64
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_TARGET_X86_64
> static
I have written a simple code like this
```c
#include
#include
//#define CONFIG_TARGET_X86_64
#ifdef CONFIG_TARGET_X86_64
static void A( )
{
printf("A\n");
}
#else
void A( );
#endif
static void B( )
{
printf("B\n");
}
static int xx( )
{
#ifdef CONFIG_TARGET_X86_64
return 1;
#else
Snapshot gcc-8-20171203 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/8-20171203/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 8 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk revision
On 03/12/17 10:50, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 05:00:23PM +, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> On 02/12/17 14:04, Liu Hao wrote:
>>>
>>> 0) What is the magical `@tpoff` suffix supposed to do? The `@ntpoff` and
>>> `@dtpoff` things are documented in System V ABI but there doesn't seem
>>
On 2017/12/3 18:50, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Well, for GNU TLS (rather than GNU2) you want to read
> https://www.akkadia.org/drepper/tls.pdf
>
> Jakub
>
Thank you too. I am thinking about migrating the technique used by GCC
on Linux to Windows, minimizing modification by our side, since it
s
On Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 05:00:23PM +, Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 02/12/17 14:04, Liu Hao wrote:
> >
> > 0) What is the magical `@tpoff` suffix supposed to do? The `@ntpoff` and
> > `@dtpoff` things are documented in System V ABI but there doesn't seem
> > to be anything about `@tpoff`.
> > 1) Ho
On 2017/12/3 1:00, Andrew Haley wrote:
> Have you read
>
> https://www.fsfla.org/~lxoliva/writeups/TLS/RFC-TLSDESC-x86.txt
>
> ?
>
No. Well, will do. Thanks for the information.
--
Best regards,
LH_Mouse
