Snapshot gcc-8-20171119 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/8-20171119/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 8 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk revision
Yes, it seems walk_tree does the job, I was probably doing something
wrong before. Thank you.
I have a question about it. Am I correct in assuming I only have to
check the subtrees of nodes that satisfy EXPR_P? So for nodes that
aren't EXPR_P, can I just set *walkSubtrees to 0, or will that miss
s
On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 04:19:45PM +, bradf...@fstab.me wrote:
For reference, I am compiling everything using gcc trunk, at commit
254929 from Sun Nov 19, and I am benchmarking on a Skylake i7-6700K
at 4.0GHz.
And something else I should definitely have included in the first place,
I cannot
Hello,
I was playing around with 64bit arithmetic with -m32 enabled and
encountered some strange optimization in what I thought was a very
simple case.
My test function, which I appreciate is totally artifical, is as
follows:
uint64_t sum(uint64_t a, uint64_t b) {
return a + b;
}
This is ob
