gcc-6-20171101 is now available

2017-11-01 Thread gccadmin
Snapshot gcc-6-20171101 is now available on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/6-20171101/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 6 SVN branch with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcc-6

Re: libmvec simd math functions in fortran

2017-11-01 Thread Szabolcs Nagy
On 01/11/17 16:26, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 04:23:11PM +, Szabolcs Nagy wrote: >> is there a way to get vectorized math functions in fortran? >> >> in c code there is attribute simd declarations or openmp >> declare simd pragma to tell the compiler which functions >> have

Re: Where should I report security related issues?

2017-11-01 Thread Florian Weimer
* Jeff Law: > On 11/01/2017 03:22 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: >> * Charo: >> >>> Is there any private list or something like that to report it >>> or should I use the GCC bug tracker? >> >> You could pick one of the distributions and let them handle this: >> >> * Debian >> * Red Hat >> * SUSE

Re: libmvec simd math functions in fortran

2017-11-01 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 04:23:11PM +, Szabolcs Nagy wrote: > is there a way to get vectorized math functions in fortran? > > in c code there is attribute simd declarations or openmp > declare simd pragma to tell the compiler which functions > have simd variant, but i see no such thing in fortr

libmvec simd math functions in fortran

2017-11-01 Thread Szabolcs Nagy
is there a way to get vectorized math functions in fortran? in c code there is attribute simd declarations or openmp declare simd pragma to tell the compiler which functions have simd variant, but i see no such thing in fortran. some targets have -mveclibabi=type which allows vectorizing a set of

Re: Where should I report security related issues?

2017-11-01 Thread Jeff Law
On 11/01/2017 03:22 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: * Charo: Is there any private list or something like that to report it or should I use the GCC bug tracker? You could pick one of the distributions and let them handle this: * Debian * Red Hat * SUSE Just contacting one distribution is suffic

Re: Problems in IPA passes

2017-11-01 Thread Jeff Law
On 11/01/2017 08:24 AM, Richard Biener wrote: On November 1, 2017 3:12:05 PM GMT+01:00, Jeff Law wrote: On 11/01/2017 12:31 AM, Richard Biener wrote: In my local tree I'm just passing around the vrp_bitmap_obstack right now. Nobody's accessing it via a global anymore. So at least we know

Re: Problems in IPA passes

2017-11-01 Thread Richard Biener
On November 1, 2017 3:12:05 PM GMT+01:00, Jeff Law wrote: >On 11/01/2017 12:31 AM, Richard Biener wrote: > >>> In my local tree I'm just passing around the vrp_bitmap_obstack >right >>> now. Nobody's accessing it via a global anymore. So at least we >know >>> what routines directly or indirectly

Re: Problems in IPA passes

2017-11-01 Thread Jeff Law
On 11/01/2017 12:31 AM, Richard Biener wrote: In my local tree I'm just passing around the vrp_bitmap_obstack right now. Nobody's accessing it via a global anymore. So at least we know what routines directly or indirectly want to touch vrp_bitmap_obstack. Maybe that's not necessary in most p

Re: Where should I report security related issues?

2017-11-01 Thread Florian Weimer
* Charo: > Is there any private list or something like that to report it > or should I use the GCC bug tracker? You could pick one of the distributions and let them handle this: * Debian * Red Hat * SUSE Just contacting one distribution is sufficient.

Where should I report security related issues?

2017-11-01 Thread Charo _
Dear maintainers, Recently I found some vulnerabilities in one of the GCC libraries. Is there any private list or something like that to report it or should I use the GCC bug tracker? Thanks in advance, Charo