On June 28, 2017 6:10:27 PM GMT+02:00, Tamar Christina
wrote:
>Hi All,
>
>I noticed something weird with IPA and I'm wondering if it's a bug or
>not.
>
>Given these two functions
>
>double
>check_d_pos (double x, double y)
>{
> return x * __builtin_copysign (1.0, y);
>}
>
>double
>check_d_neg (d
Hi All,
I noticed something weird with IPA and I'm wondering if it's a bug or not.
Given these two functions
double
check_d_pos (double x, double y)
{
return x * __builtin_copysign (1.0, y);
}
double
check_d_neg (double x, double y)
{
return __builtin_copysign (-1.0, y) * x;
}
and current
A release candidate for GCC 6.4 is available from
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/6.4.0-RC-20170628/
and shortly its mirrors. It has been generated from SVN revision 249715.
I have so far bootstrapped and tested the release candidate on
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Please test it and
On 28/06/17 05:00, Benxi Liu wrote:
> I'm using GCC 5.4.0. I know that in some situations, GCC will put
> data into .text section, to improve performance. I know one case is
> jump table, but I'm still curious about other cases. What kind of data
> will be put into executable sections? Is there a
All changes require release manager approval.
Thanks,
Richard.
Hi R0b0t1,
Thanks for your reply!
That helps me a lot, and now I know it's a more complicated question
than I've thought.
I'm using GCC on X86_64, more specially, on linux x86_64. I also find
that when compiling with -O2, GCC will emits some data(like const
string or const int) into .text. I wonder
