I have found GCJ to be one of the best methods for bootstrapping
OpenJDK. No other method of adding support for new architectures that
does not involve working closely with OpenJDK upstream is known to me.
It is, of course, possible to add any architecture without the use of
GCJ, but if one wishes
Snapshot gcc-5-20170221 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/5-20170221/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 5 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcc-5
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Olivier Hainque wrote:
> Hi David,
>
>> On Feb 17, 2017, at 01:10 , David Edelsohn wrote:
>>
>> This is not a new issue. The maintainer did not suddenly resign last
>> week. There have been numerous efforts to reach out to the SPE
>> community for over a *decad
On 02/21/2017 03:56 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 21 February 2017 at 14:55, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 21 February 2017 at 14:51, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 03:44:17PM +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
There is no flag to suppress that error or demote it to a warning, is there?
On 21 February 2017 at 14:51, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 03:44:17PM +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
>> There is no flag to suppress that error or demote it to a warning, is there?
>> Could be useful when adapting large code bases to C++17 incrementally.
>
> It is a warning in C++
On 21 February 2017 at 14:55, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 21 February 2017 at 14:51, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 03:44:17PM +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
>>> There is no flag to suppress that error or demote it to a warning, is there?
>>> Could be useful when adapting large cod
There is no flag to suppress that error or demote it to a warning, is
there? Could be useful when adapting large code bases to C++17
incrementally.
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 03:44:17PM +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> There is no flag to suppress that error or demote it to a warning, is there?
> Could be useful when adapting large code bases to C++17 incrementally.
It is a warning in C++11/C++14 now, so compile with -std=c++14 and
incrementally
Hi,
we have to analyse a C++ code that show significant run time overhead through
the scorep instrumentation. Therefore we want to use the compile time filtering
to get reasonable results.
If I understand correctly, scorep need the GCC plugin interface to have the
compile time filtering and I
