Re: Obsolete powerpc*-*-*spe*

2017-02-20 Thread Olivier Hainque
Hi David, > On Feb 17, 2017, at 01:10 , David Edelsohn wrote: > > This is not a new issue. The maintainer did not suddenly resign last > week. There have been numerous efforts to reach out to the SPE > community for over a *decade*, cajoling them to step up with > maintenance for the port. I

Re: Improving code generation in the nvptx back end

2017-02-20 Thread Alexander Monakov
On Fri, 17 Feb 2017, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > On Fri, 17 Feb 2017 14:00:09 +0100, I wrote: > > [...] for "normal" functions there is no reason to use the > > ".param" space for passing arguments in and out of functions. We can > > then get rid of the boilerplate code to move ".param %in_ar*" into

Re: Improving code generation in the nvptx back end

2017-02-20 Thread Bernd Schmidt
On 02/17/2017 02:09 PM, Thomas Schwinge wrote: Hi! On Fri, 17 Feb 2017 14:00:09 +0100, I wrote: [...] for "normal" functions there is no reason to use the ".param" space for passing arguments in and out of functions. We can then get rid of the boilerplate code to move ".param %in_ar*" into ".r

Re: [contribution] C11 threads implementation for Unix and Windows environments

2017-02-20 Thread Szabolcs Nagy
On 20/02/17 07:49, Sebastian Huber wrote: > Hello Gokan, > > you may have a look at: > > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/lib/libstdthreads/ note that despite the looks this is non-portable and non-conforming implementation, it is way better than the posted github code, but it can still clob