Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

2016-10-10 Thread Eric S. Raymond
Joseph Myers : > In practice there are a lot of ways people have messed up ChangeLog > commits or commit messages that I would expect to confuse such author > extraction, even before you get to the parts of the history converted from > CVS. This is also true. I looked seriously at what it woul

Re: Converting to LRA (calling all maintainers)

2016-10-10 Thread Eric Botcazou
> > Do we have a Wiki page for the cc0 conversion? If no, I can start one > > based on my fresh experience with the Visium port. > > There is none so far as far as I know. Thanks for volunteering, OK, the page is at https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/CC0Transition and linked to from the "Current Project

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

2016-10-10 Thread Joseph Myers
On Mon, 10 Oct 2016, Eric S. Raymond wrote: > I strongly recomend that if you want to try this, you separate it from the > initial repo conversion. That is, get the project to git first. Then > see if you can data-mine author information out of the history. If, > and only if, you get results tha

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

2016-10-10 Thread Eric S. Raymond
Joseph Myers : > This is still hypothetical, since I haven't seen any scripts posted that > would actual implement this, or any resulting mappings of commits, and one > wouldn't normally expect a repository conversion to attempt to distinguish > committer from author when the source version cont

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

2016-10-10 Thread Joseph Myers
On Mon, 10 Oct 2016, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > My view is: contributors are free to specify what name and email address > > they want used, but if they want something other than a single name and > > email address for the whole commit history with a given username, it's the > > contributor's resp

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

2016-10-10 Thread Jason Merrill
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 6:38 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 7 October 2016 at 22:26, Joseph Myers wrote: >> On Fri, 7 Oct 2016, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: >>> FWIW, I thought at one point the consensus was that the mailmap would >>> expand only to $use...@gcc.gnu.org rather than $userid@$organizatio

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

2016-10-10 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 7 October 2016 at 22:26, Joseph Myers wrote: > On Fri, 7 Oct 2016, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: >> FWIW, I thought at one point the consensus was that the mailmap would >> expand only to $use...@gcc.gnu.org rather than $userid@$organization, >> esp. considering the case where there is no single $orga

Re: error printing in reversed order ?

2016-10-10 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 7 October 2016 at 21:41, nicolas bouillot wrote: > oops this works better: > alias reversed_make='make 2>&1 >/dev/null | tac | egrep --color > "\b(error|cpp|hpp)\b|$"' Or just make 2>&1 | less