gcc-6-20161006 is now available

2016-10-06 Thread gccadmin
Snapshot gcc-6-20161006 is now available on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/6-20161006/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 6 SVN branch with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcc-6

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

2016-10-06 Thread Frank Ch. Eigler
Jason Merrill writes: > [...] gcc.gnu.org already refuses git connections fairly frequently > due to overloading [...] With the corresponding reduction in cpu load from svn users, plus the ready adjustability of those xinetd thresholds, please don't let that hold you back. - FChE

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

2016-10-06 Thread Joseph Myers
On Thu, 6 Oct 2016, Jason Merrill wrote: > After I ran into a couple of reposurgeon bugs and didn't hear back > from you, I started investigating rewriting the existing git svn > mirror with git filter-branch instead. That seems an attractive > option, but not long afterward I needed to shift foc

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

2016-10-06 Thread Jason Merrill
On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 1:19 PM, Eric S. Raymond wrote: > Joseph Myers : >> On Thu, 6 Oct 2016, Eric S. Raymond wrote: >> >> > I thought the gcc conversion was done. >> > >> > I can make the repository available again if it's needed. >> >> The conversion got stalled (I'm not sure why; maybe just Ja

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

2016-10-06 Thread Eric S. Raymond
Joseph Myers : > On Thu, 6 Oct 2016, Eric S. Raymond wrote: > > > I thought the gcc conversion was done. > > > > I can make the repository available again if it's needed. > > The conversion got stalled (I'm not sure why; maybe just Jason being busy > with other things) but is still intended (I'

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

2016-10-06 Thread Joseph Myers
On Thu, 6 Oct 2016, Eric S. Raymond wrote: > I thought the gcc conversion was done. > > I can make the repository available again if it's needed. The conversion got stalled (I'm not sure why; maybe just Jason being busy with other things) but is still intended (I'm not sure for when), so yes t

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

2016-10-06 Thread Eric S. Raymond
Joseph Myers : > On Thu, 27 Aug 2015, Eric S. Raymond wrote: > > > I've made it available at: > > > > http://thyrsus.com/gitweb/?p=gcc-conversion.git > > What happened with this repository? Is it somewhere else now? Pulling in > my clone of git://thyrsus.com/repositories/gcc-conversion.git ha

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

2016-10-06 Thread Joseph Myers
On Thu, 27 Aug 2015, Eric S. Raymond wrote: > I've made it available at: > > http://thyrsus.com/gitweb/?p=gcc-conversion.git What happened with this repository? Is it somewhere else now? Pulling in my clone of git://thyrsus.com/repositories/gcc-conversion.git has produced "thyrsus.com[0: 71.

Re: style convention: /*foo_p=*/ to annotate bool arguments

2016-10-06 Thread David Brown
On 05/10/16 22:24, Florian Weimer wrote: > * David Brown: > >> Far and away the best solution would be for C++ to support named >> parameters or named arguments: >> >> >> >> Then you could write: >> >> foo(1, 2, bar_p: true);