Hi,
Here's a report of a successful build and install of GCC:
$ gcc-6.2.0/config.guess
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
$ newcompiler/bin/gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=newcompiler/bin/gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/home/aaro/gcctest/newcompiler/libexec/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/6.2.0/lto-wrapper
Targ
On 09/21/2016 07:39 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 05:29:03PM -0600, Martin Sebor wrote:
I'm seeing a number of failures in different tests in the tree-prof
directory when I run make check in parallel none of which are
reproducible with -j1. I don't see anything about in Bugzi
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 1:59 AM, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> So, first step is done. Our firmware is using GCC 6.2.
>
> If i see it correctly, main problem are binutils. First of all we need
> custom binutils to compile GCC assambler code with custom opcodes - it's
> a horror.
> What would be better w
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 05:29:03PM -0600, Martin Sebor wrote:
> I'm seeing a number of failures in different tests in the tree-prof
> directory when I run make check in parallel none of which are
> reproducible with -j1. I don't see anything about in Bugzilla or
> in recent test results. Has anyo
Am 08.09.2016 um 19:13 schrieb Oleksij Rempel:
> Am 08.09.2016 um 18:10 schrieb augustine.sterl...@gmail.com:
>> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 8:14 AM, Oleksij Rempel
>> wrote:
>>> Am 07.09.2016 um 18:21 schrieb augustine.sterl...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 11:55 PM, Thomas Schwinge
wr
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 1:29 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
> I'm seeing a number of failures in different tests in the tree-prof
> directory when I run make check in parallel none of which are
> reproducible with -j1. I don't see anything about in Bugzilla or
> in recent test results. Has anyone notic
