> Probably the earliest I could look into this again would be
> November.
OK, fine with me. I'm going to slightly restructure the support of the
integer condition codes in preparation for the implementation of the new
overflow arithmetic operations, but there should be no overlap.
--
Eric Bot
From: Eric Botcazou
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2016 10:18:23 +0200
>> I lacked the time to debug it properly so we reverted.
>
> Do you plan to give it a try again in the near future?
I was going to work on this over the past summer, but other
responsibilities took up all of my time.
Probably the earli
> I lacked the time to debug it properly so we reverted.
Do you plan to give it a try again in the near future?
--
Eric Botcazou
From: Eric Botcazou
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2016 23:43:43 +0200
>> p.s. Are there plans for converting the SPARC port?
>
> There are more than plans - actual patches by DaveM that were installed at
> some point and then reverted quickly because of unexpected fallout.
Yeah, sparc64 failed to bootstr
