Snapshot gcc-6-20160908 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/6-20160908/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 6 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcc-6
Am 08.09.2016 um 18:10 schrieb augustine.sterl...@gmail.com:
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 8:14 AM, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
>> Am 07.09.2016 um 18:21 schrieb augustine.sterl...@gmail.com:
>>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 11:55 PM, Thomas Schwinge
>>> wrote:
Hi!
Neither do I really know anything
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 8:14 AM, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> Am 07.09.2016 um 18:21 schrieb augustine.sterl...@gmail.com:
>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 11:55 PM, Thomas Schwinge
>> wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> Neither do I really know anything about Xtensa, nor do I have a lot of
>>> experience in these parts o
Am 07.09.2016 um 18:21 schrieb augustine.sterl...@gmail.com:
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 11:55 PM, Thomas Schwinge
> wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> Neither do I really know anything about Xtensa, nor do I have a lot of
>> experience in these parts of GCC back ends, but:
>
> There is a lot of background to know
Hi!
On Wed, 7 Sep 2016 14:23:18 +0200, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 1:52 PM, Thomas Schwinge
> wrote:
> > I trimmed the CC list -- I'm looking for advice about debugging a lto1
> > ICE.
> >
> > On Fri, 19 Aug 2016 11:05:59 +, Joseph Myers
> > wrote:
> >> On Fri, 19 Aug
On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 1:45 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Sep 2016, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>
>> It looks that different handling of _Complex char, _Complex short and
>> _Complex float is there on purpose. Is (was?) there a limitation in a
>> c language standard that prevents passing of these arg
