On 10-Aug-16 08:41 PM, Vladimir N Makarov wrote:
As for memory constraint you should not to return true for a pseudo.
Reload/LRA can figure out how to match a spilled pseudo with memory
(but this constraint should be define_memory_constraint, i saw
mistakes when people used different forms of
Discussion started here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-08/msg01678.html
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 08:51:16PM +0300, Alexander Monakov wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Aug 2016, Alan Modra wrote:
> > Given a hidden visibility function declaration, the toolchain can say
> > that the function is local to
On 08/19/2016 12:55 PM, Umesh Kalappa via llvm-dev wrote:
We have the legacy code ,that uses the .stabs directive quiet often
in the source code like
.stabs "symbol_name", 100, 0, 0, 0 + .label_one f;
.label_one
stmt
and ,the above code is wrapped with the inline asm in the c source
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 1:31 PM, Jérôme Kunegis wrote:
> Dear GCC Web team
>
>
> I just wanted to let you know that on
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-6/
>
> the link to the gcc-6.2 documentation links to the gcc-6.1 documentation
Thanks, fixed.
Richard.
>
> Cheers
>
> Jérôme
>
>
> --
> Dr. Jérôme
Dear GCC Web team
I just wanted to let you know that on
https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-6/
the link to the gcc-6.2 documentation links to the gcc-6.1 documentation
Cheers
Jérôme
--
Dr. Jérôme Kunegis
Institute for Web Science and Technologies
University of Koblenz-Landau
http://userpages.uni-kobl
Hi Guys,
It has been a long time since my last post, so there is lots to tell
you about. First of all there have been major releases of most of
the tools:
GCC 6.2 is here. This is mostly a bug-fix release over gcc 6.1 of
course, but it does also include a few enhancements for the SPAR
On 08/21/2016 05:59 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 02:04:49PM -0500, Daniel Santos wrote:
Thanks for the response! Perhaps an UNSPEC insn is needed here because I
have work to do on other passes too. For example, when the debug info is
created, it's giving the wrong locati
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 10:19 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Aug 2016, Joseph Myers wrote:
>> Is there a reason there's no changes.html for GCC 7 at this point?
>
> None, apart from me missing it and http://gcc.gnu.org/releasing.html
> as well.
We've been creating those lazily over the la
