Hello Everyone ,
We have the legacy code ,that uses the .stabs directive quiet often
in the source code like
.stabs "symbol_name", 100, 0, 0, 0 + .label_one f;
.label_one
stmt
and ,the above code is wrapped with the inline asm in the c source file .
we are using clang 3.8(with lto)
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 10:00 AM, Prasad Ghangal
wrote:
> On 16 August 2016 at 14:10, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 8:59 PM, Prasad Ghangal
>> wrote:
>>> On 11 August 2016 at 15:58, Richard Biener
>>> wrote:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 7:47 AM, Prasad Ghangal
wrote:
>
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 5:57 PM, Steven G. Kargl
wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 09:25:41AM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> On 18 August 2016 at 08:59, Richard Biener wrote:
>> > No, but you can try --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs
>>
>> But be aware that for multilib targets that's been b
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 08:45:49AM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 01:50:52PM +0800, lhmouse wrote:
> > Given the `_fxsave()` function returning `void`, it is invalid C but valid
> > C++:
>
> It is also a GNU C extension.
And GCC warns with -Wpedantic (but not without). It
On 19 August 2016 at 07:29, David Wohlferd wrote:
> Interesting. Seems slightly strange, but I've seen stranger. I guess it's
> seen as "cleaner" than forcing this into 2 statements.
That's not the reason for the C++ rule. It's that you don't
necessarily know what the return type is, e.g.
templ
On 16 August 2016 at 14:10, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 8:59 PM, Prasad Ghangal
> wrote:
>> On 11 August 2016 at 15:58, Richard Biener
>> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 7:47 AM, Prasad Ghangal
>>> wrote:
In this patch I am trying to parse gimple call. But I am gett
