Am 16.08.2016 um 20:57 schrieb Richard Biener:
On August 16, 2016 7:11:26 PM GMT+02:00, Thomas Koenig
wrote:
What would it take to use an LTO-enabled version of gfortran?
It could turn out to be quite useful for speeding up programs,
especially where I/O or array intrinsics are used.
I also
Snapshot gcc-5-20160816 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/5-20160816/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 5 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcc-5
On August 16, 2016 7:11:26 PM GMT+02:00, Thomas Koenig
wrote:
>What would it take to use an LTO-enabled version of gfortran?
>
>It could turn out to be quite useful for speeding up programs,
>especially where I/O or array intrinsics are used.
>
>I also expect many issues to surface where libgfort
What would it take to use an LTO-enabled version of gfortran?
It could turn out to be quite useful for speeding up programs,
especially where I/O or array intrinsics are used.
I also expect many issues to surface where libgfortran is
playing with types in a way that could break LTO, so I
would n
On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 12:40 AM, Kumar, Venkataramanan
wrote:
> Hi
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: NightStrike [mailto:nightstr...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Monday, May 2, 2016 10:31 PM
>> To: Kumar, Venkataramanan
>> Cc: Uros Bizjak (ubiz...@gmail.com) ;
>> lopeziba...@gmail.com; Jan Hubicka
My hardware directly supports instructions of the form
subreg:SI(reg:VEC v1,3) = SI:a1
That is, a particular field of a vector register can be used as the
target of a move from a general register. Reginfo refuses to recognize
that any registers can satisfy this subreg expression and theref
On Fri, 22 Apr 2016, Chris Gregory wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/codingconventions.html#ExternC
>
> In the `Extern "C"` commentary, the coding conventions says:
>
> Definitions within the body of a namespace are not indented.
>
> This should read
>
> Definitions within the body of an `ex
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 8:59 PM, Prasad Ghangal
wrote:
> On 11 August 2016 at 15:58, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 7:47 AM, Prasad Ghangal
>> wrote:
>>> In this patch I am trying to parse gimple call. But I am getting weird
>>> gimple dump for that.
>>>
>>> for this testcase:
