Snapshot gcc-5-20160705 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/5-20160705/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 5 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcc-5
On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 12:09 PM, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
> jwakely.gcc wrote:
>
>> [...] (When we switched Fedora to using GCC 6, with C++14 enabled by
>> default, dozens and dozens of C++ packages failed to compile,
>> because even in 2016 nobody had ever tried to compile them with
>> C++11 featu
On 07/04/2016 03:43 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 22 June 2016 at 10:28, David Wohlferd wrote:
And I *get* that it takes time to re-write this, and people have schedules,
lives, a need for sleep. But even under the most insanely aggressive
schedule I can imagine (if gcc continue to release ~
On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 8:58 PM, Prasad Ghangal wrote:
> On 4 July 2016 at 15:17, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Prasad Ghangal
>> wrote:
>>> In this patch, I am passing labels and vars with internal function and
>>> handling them in tree-cfg for parsing PHI.
>>> For fi
CC'ing Jakub, Marek and Kostya, sanitizer maintainers in GCC.
On 04/07/16 14:12, Maxim Ostapenko wrote:
Hi!
Although in languages like C and C++ unsigned integer overflow
reliably wraps around and well defined, sometimes it may indicate an
error in code and lead to undesirable consequences an
