Snapshot gcc-4.9-20160629 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.9-20160629/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.9 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
On 29 June 2016 at 22:15, Richard Biener wrote:
> On June 29, 2016 6:20:29 PM GMT+02:00, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> wrote:
>>On 18 June 2016 at 12:02, Prasad Ghangal
>>wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I tried hacking pass manager to execute only given passes. For this I
>>> am adding new member as opt_pass *c
On June 29, 2016 6:20:29 PM GMT+02:00, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
>On 18 June 2016 at 12:02, Prasad Ghangal
>wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I tried hacking pass manager to execute only given passes. For this I
>> am adding new member as opt_pass *custom_pass_list to the function
>> structure to store passe
On 18 June 2016 at 12:02, Prasad Ghangal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried hacking pass manager to execute only given passes. For this I
> am adding new member as opt_pass *custom_pass_list to the function
> structure to store passes need to execute and providing the
> custom_pass_list to execute_pass_list
On 06/29/2016 12:13 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
> Can I ask you for adding missing tag for 5.4.1
> (32c3b88e8ced4b6d022484a73c40f3d663e20fd4) ?
I mean 5.4.0.
Thanks
On 12/19/2014 05:16 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 3:12 AM, Jonathan Wakely
> wrote:
>> On 16 November 2014 at 15:51, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Git tags are missing for GCC 4.9.1, 4.9.2, 4.8.3 and 4.7.4.
>>
>> I can't create the tags but these are the release commits:
>>
>> git
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 4:16 PM, Prasad Ghangal
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> For handling PHI, it expects cfg to be built before. So I was
> wondering how are we going to handle this? Do we need to build cfg
> while parsing only?
For handling PHIs we need to have a CFG in the sense that the GIMPLE PHI
data s