Snapshot gcc-6-20160602 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/6-20160602/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 6 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcc-6
On Thu, 2016-06-02 at 14:46 -0500, Ethin Probst wrote:
[...snip...]
> (I've had to redo the
> compilation more than once because SSH decided to idle timeout and
> make noted the hangup, ending the compilation process immediately due
> to there being no TTY to send messages to, even though I'd had t
Hello GCC developers and GCC mailing list members:
This message concerns some warnings noted by GCC during the
compilation of GCC 6.1.0. If GCC had the -Werror flag passed, this
would be an error. I'm not sure if this is an error, just a warning
that I should ignore, or a bug, but I just wanted you
On 06/02/16 13:14, Marcin Baczyński wrote:
2016-06-02 11:55 GMT+02:00 K :
Hi,
My question is what if a compiler will generate a virtual destructor (or
convert a nonvirtual to virtual) in a base class if the base class has at
least one virtual function and classes down in the hierarchy have
no
On Jun 2 18:18, JonY wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'd like to apply for the position of Cygwin and mingw-w64 gcc port
> maintainer. What do I need to do to accomplish that?
This sounds like a good idea to me, given that Jon is Cygwin distro
maintainer for the native as well as the mingw-w64 cross toolch
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 2:53 AM, Trevor Saunders wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 08:54:36AM +1000, kugan wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> When I compile the following code with g++ using -fstrict-enums and -O2
>>
>> enum v
>> {
>> OK = 0,
>> NOK = 1,
>> };
>>
>> int foo0 (enum v a)
>> {
>> if (a > NO
Hello,
I'd like to apply for the position of Cygwin and mingw-w64 gcc port
maintainer. What do I need to do to accomplish that?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
2016-06-02 11:55 GMT+02:00 K :
> Hi,
>
> My question is what if a compiler will generate a virtual destructor (or
> convert a nonvirtual to virtual) in a base class if the base class has at
> least one virtual function and classes down in the hierarchy have
> nontrivial destructors? In other word
Hi,
My question is what if a compiler will generate a virtual destructor (or
convert a nonvirtual to virtual) in a base class if the base class has
at least one virtual function and classes down in the hierarchy have
nontrivial destructors? In other words make a compiler responsible for
pro
10 matches
Mail list logo