Re: ipa vrp implementation in gcc

2016-01-17 Thread vivek pandya
Vivek Pandya On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 11:35 AM, vivek pandya wrote: > Vivek Pandya > > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 4:16 AM, Kugan > wrote: >> >> >> > Hello I am Vivek Pandya, I am actually working on a GSoC 2016 proposal >> > for his work and it is very similar to extending ipa-cp pass. I am also

Re: ipa vrp implementation in gcc

2016-01-17 Thread vivek pandya
Vivek Pandya On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 4:16 AM, Kugan wrote: > > > > Hello I am Vivek Pandya, I am actually working on a GSoC 2016 proposal > > for his work and it is very similar to extending ipa-cp pass. I am also > > in touch with Jan Hubicka. > > Hi Vivek, > > Glad to know that you are plannin

C/C++ standards supported by the preprocessor

2016-01-17 Thread Sandra Loosemore
I noticed that the section on preprocessor options in the GCC manual (which is also shared by the CPP manual) still claims that the default -std= values are gnu90 for C and gnu++98 for C++, and does not list any C++ versions after gnu++98. AFAICT from digging through code and trying some expe

Re: ipa vrp implementation in gcc

2016-01-17 Thread Kugan
Hi, > Another potential use of value ranges is the profile estimation. > http://www.lighterra.com/papers/valuerangeprop/Patterson1995-ValueRangeProp.pdf > It seems to me that we may want to have something that can feed sane loop > bounds for profile estimation as well and we can easily store the

Re: ipa vrp implementation in gcc

2016-01-17 Thread Kugan
> Hello I am Vivek Pandya, I am actually working on a GSoC 2016 proposal > for his work and it is very similar to extending ipa-cp pass. I am also > in touch with Jan Hubicka. Hi Vivek, Glad to know that you are planning to work on this. Could you please put you plan in an accessible place (or p

gcc-6-20160117 is now available

2016-01-17 Thread gccadmin
Snapshot gcc-6-20160117 is now available on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/6-20160117/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 6 SVN branch with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk revision

help with PR69133

2016-01-17 Thread Prathamesh Kulkarni
Hi, I was having a look at PR69133. It appears that with -flto-partition=none, cgraph_node::get_untransformed_body () is called twice for node with asm_name _ZThn4_N11xercesc_3_11C5m_fn6ERKi. c++filt says it is: non-virtual thunk to xercesc_3_1::C::m_fn6(int const&) get_untransformed_body() calls