Hello Bernd,
On 13.01.2016 21:25, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
There are a few open PRs involving sel-sched, and I'd like to start a
discussion about removing it. Having two separate schedulers isn't a very
good idea in the first place IMO, and since ia64 is dead, sel-sched gets
practically no testing d
Snapshot gcc-4.9-20160113 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.9-20160113/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.9 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
On 01/13/2016 04:33 AM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
I've been able to get it to do the right thing by changing the line
where it initially folds the source of the SET. That is line 4639 in
cse.c: /* Simplify and foldable subexpressions in SRC. Then get the
fully- simplified result, which may not nece
There are a few open PRs involving sel-sched, and I'd like to start a
discussion about removing it. Having two separate schedulers isn't a
very good idea in the first place IMO, and since ia64 is dead, sel-sched
gets practically no testing despite being the more complex one.
Thoughts?
Bernd
On 01/13/2016 06:17 AM, Matthias Klose wrote:
Here are some first results from a distro test rebuild using GCC 6. A
snapshot of the current Ubuntu development series was taken on 20151218
for all architectures (amd64, arm64, armhf, i386/i686, powerpc, ppc64el,
s390x), and rebuilt unmodified using
Here are some first results from a distro test rebuild using GCC 6. A snapshot
of the current Ubuntu development series was taken on 20151218 for all
architectures (amd64, arm64, armhf, i386/i686, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x), and
rebuilt unmodified using the current GCC 5 branch, and using GCC 6 20
Hi all,
I'm looking at mitigating some of the codegen regressions on arm that come from
a proposed fix
to PR 65932 and I believe RTL CSE is getting in the way.
The problematic sequences involve sign-extending loads and sign-extending
multiplies.
From the gcc.target/arm/wmul-1.c case we have:
(
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 11:05 PM, Jim Wilson wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 2:22 PM, Jim Wilson wrote:
>> I see a number of places in tree-vect-generic.c that add a
>> VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR if useless_type_convertsion_p is false. That should
>> work, except when I try this, I see that the VIEW_CON
On 01/13/2016 03:04 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 03:11:29PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
Will,
On 01/09/2016 12:53 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 02:36:32PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
On 01/07/2016 11:56 PM, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
On 07/01/16 14
