On Fri, 2015-12-04 at 16:22 +0800, Bin.Cheng wrote:
> Dump before IVO is as below:
>
> :
> # s1_1 = PHI
> # s2_2 = PHI
> s1_6 = s1_1 + 1;
> c1_8 = *s1_1;
> s2_9 = s2_2 + 1;
> c2_10 = *s2_2;
> if (c1_8 == 0)
> goto ;
> else
> goto ;
>
> And the iv candidates are as:
>
> "Martin" == Martin Sebor writes:
Martin> To get around these, I end up using info macro to print the
Martin> macro definition and using whatever it expands to instead. I
Martin> wonder if someone has found a more convenient workaround.
For some of these, like the __builtin_offsetof and __
The GNU Compiler Collection version 5.3 has been released.
GCC 5.3 is a bug-fix release from the GCC 5 branch
containing important fixes for regressions and serious bugs in
GCC 5.2 with more than 143 bugs fixed since the previous release.
This release is available from the FTP servers listed at:
On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 02:37:46PM +0100, Marc Glisse wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Dec 2015, NightStrike wrote:
>
> >Will there be another 4.9 release, too? I'm really hoping that branch
> >can stay open a bit, since I can't upgrade to the new std::string
> >implementation yet.
>
> Uh? The new ABI in libs
On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Marc Glisse wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Dec 2015, NightStrike wrote:
>
>> Will there be another 4.9 release, too? I'm really hoping that branch
>> can stay open a bit, since I can't upgrade to the new std::string
>> implementation yet.
Yes, there will be another 4.9 releas
On Fri, 4 Dec 2015, NightStrike wrote:
Will there be another 4.9 release, too? I'm really hoping that branch
can stay open a bit, since I can't upgrade to the new std::string
implementation yet.
Uh? The new ABI in libstdc++ is supposed to be optional, you can still use
the old std::string in
Will there be another 4.9 release, too? I'm really hoping that branch
can stay open a bit, since I can't upgrade to the new std::string
implementation yet.
On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 8:29 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> Status
> ==
>
> The GCC 5 branch is open again for regression and documentatio
Status
==
The GCC 5 branch is open again for regression and documentation fixes.
If nothing unusual happens you can expect GCC 5.4 somewhen closely
before GCC 6 is released.
Quality Data
Priority # Change from last report
--- --
On 3 December 2015 at 16:01, Martin Sebor wrote:
> On 12/02/2015 06:48 PM, Peter Bergner wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 2015-12-02 at 20:05 -0500, Ryan Burn wrote:
>>>
>>> Is there any way to easily build a stage1 gcc with macro support for
>>> debugging?
>>>
>>> I tried setting CFLAGS, and CXXFLAGS to speci
On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 11:00 AM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 5:11 AM, Steve Ellcey wrote:
>>>
>>> I have a question involving ivopts and PR 48814, which was a fix for
>>> the post increment operation. Prior to the fix for PR 488
10 matches
Mail list logo
