Re: Moving to git

2015-08-25 Thread Andreas Schwab
Jason Merrill writes: > So that seems like a suitable monotonically increasing identifier. Git does not guarantee it, though. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different.

Re: Moving to git

2015-08-25 Thread Jason Merrill
On 08/24/2015 11:54 AM, Richard Earnshaw wrote: Why not use the output of 'git show -s --format=%ct-%h'? $ git show -s --format=%ct-%h master 1440153969-f57da59 That gives you a unix timestamp for the commit, followed by the hash. Now you've got a fully ordered way of referring to the commit, b

Re: Moving to git

2015-08-25 Thread Eric S. Raymond
Jason Merrill : > git-svn find-rev takes r123456 and returns a commit hash based on the > git-svn-id in the git log; I don't see why we would need to break that > moving forward, though I'm not sure how well it would work without reference > to an actual SVN server. It won't work at all, because g

Re: Moving to git

2015-08-25 Thread Jason Merrill
On 08/24/2015 11:49 AM, Jeff Law wrote: On 08/24/2015 09:43 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: Not to mention we should keep the existing r123456 comments in bugzilla working, and I'm not convinced keeping a SVN version of the repository (frozen) for that purpose is the best idea. I'd like to keep the ol

gcc-5-20150825 is now available

2015-08-25 Thread gccadmin
Snapshot gcc-5-20150825 is now available on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/5-20150825/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 5 SVN branch with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcc-5

Re: fake/abnormal/eh edge question

2015-08-25 Thread Jeff Law
On 08/25/2015 03:54 PM, Steve Ellcey wrote: On Tue, 2015-08-25 at 14:44 -0600, Jeff Law wrote: I want to preserve the copy of $sp to $12 and I also want to preserve the .cfi psuedo-ops (and code) in the exit block and epilogue in order for exception handling to work correctly. One way I though

Re: fake/abnormal/eh edge question

2015-08-25 Thread Steve Ellcey
On Tue, 2015-08-25 at 14:44 -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > > I want to preserve the copy of $sp to $12 and I also want to preserve the > > .cfi psuedo-ops (and code) in the exit block and epilogue in order for > > exception handling to work correctly. One way I thought of doing this > > is to create an

Re: GIMPLE-level if-converter with scratchpads --- Results from SPEC2006 FP analysis done at Richard`s request {late July / early August} --- results from running all the SPEC2006 CPU FP tests again a

2015-08-25 Thread Abe
Dear all, I have redone the SPEC2006 CPU FP tests again after adding "-march=native". Unfortunately, the results are not very good for the new if-converter. I believe this is the case because the CPU in question [details below] "only" has first-generation AVX, and, from what I`ve been told, a

Re: fake/abnormal/eh edge question

2015-08-25 Thread Jeff Law
On 08/25/2015 12:39 PM, Steve Ellcey wrote: I have a question about FAKE, EH, and ABNORMAL edges. I am not sure I understand all the implications of each type of edge from the description in cfg-flags.def. I am trying to implement dynamic stack alignment for MIPS and I have code that does the

fake/abnormal/eh edge question

2015-08-25 Thread Steve Ellcey
I have a question about FAKE, EH, and ABNORMAL edges. I am not sure I understand all the implications of each type of edge from the description in cfg-flags.def. I am trying to implement dynamic stack alignment for MIPS and I have code that does the following: prologue c

Re: Moving to git

2015-08-25 Thread Andreas Schwab
Jakub Jelinek writes: > On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 10:22:22AM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote: >> Jakub Jelinek writes: >> >> > And for those really identifying them by sha1 hashes is significantly >> > worse than using monotonically increasing small number, sha1 hashes >> > are impossible to remember