Hello GCC team,
Greetings...
I am new user of Linux. I have RHEL 6.0 installed and want to run C++
on my system but I do not know how.
Please help me or let me know where to contact.
--
Thanks & Regards,
Kumar Aditya
+919015142426
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:18:39AM -0400, Trevor Saunders wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 03:59:19PM +0200, Toon Moene wrote:
> > > Like this:
> > >
> > > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2015-04/msg01086.html
> > >
> > > ODR rears its head again ...
> >
> > huh, why is c/c-lang.h ge
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 1:18 PM, Max Filippov wrote:
> Ok, then I see why this doesn't happen: mulsi3 pattern matching is
> conditional on TARGET_MUL32, so when TARGET_MUL32 ==0 and
> expand_simple_binop emits a call to a helper it's not considered
> mulsi3, it's just a call:
>
> (call_insn/u 17 1
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>> LBR is used for both cfg edge profiling and indirect call Target value
>> profiling.
> I see, that makes sense ;) I guess if we want to support profile collection
> on targets w/o this feature we could still use one of the algorithms that
> t
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 7:45 AM, Ilya Palachev wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here are some questions about AutoFDO.
>
> On 08.05.2014 02:55, Dehao Chen wrote:
>>
>> We have open-sourced AutoFDO profile toolchain in:
>>
>> https://github.com/google/autofdo
>>
>> For GCC developers, the most important tool is cre
> LBR is used for both cfg edge profiling and indirect call Target value
> profiling.
I see, that makes sense ;) I guess if we want to support profile collection
on targets w/o this feature we could still use one of the algorithms that
try to guess edge profile from BB profile.
Honza
LBR is used for both cfg edge profiling and indirect call Target value
profiling.
David
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 3:26 PM, Xinliang David Li wrote:
> LBR is used for both cfg edge profiling and indirect call Target value
> profiling.
>
> David
>
> On Apr 10, 2015 10:39 AM, "Jan Hubicka" wrote:
>>
On Thu, 30 May 2013, Michael Witten wrote:
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/InstallingGCC
> I'm not looking for anything.
>
> That wiki information should be incorporated into what that wiki page
> calls `the official installation docs', and the rest of it should
> probably be thrown out as superfluous.
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 9:45 AM, Ilya Palachev wrote:
> > In the mentioned README file it is said that " In order to collect this
> > profile, you will need to have an Intel CPU that have last branch record
> > (LBR) support." Is this information obsolete? Chrome Canary builds use
> > AutoFDO for
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 10:51 PM, augustine.sterl...@gmail.com
wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 12:15 PM, Max Filippov wrote:
>> Then configuration w/o multiplication should call helper at -O0 and
>> use shift at higher optimization levels?
>
> That is what I would expect.
Ok, then I see why thi
On Fri, 10 Apr 2015, Martin Lucina wrote:
> On Thursday, 09.04.2015 at 16:20, Joseph Myers wrote:
> > > Why do you not recommend using the vendor component for anything
> > > significant? To me it seems the logical place to say "this is a rumprun
> > > toolchain", plus the result is easier to par
On Mon, 9 Feb 2015, EXT-Barrett, James wrote:
> The following links are broken at gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/4.9.2. The
> corresponding 4.9.2-related links at gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs are also broken:
> GCC 4.9.2 GNAT User's Guide (/onlinedocs/gcc-4.9.2/gnat_ugn_unw/)
> also in PDF (/onlinedocs
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 12:15 PM, Max Filippov wrote:
> Then configuration w/o multiplication should call helper at -O0 and
> use shift at higher optimization levels?
That is what I would expect.
13 matches
Mail list logo