05.03.2015 18:46, Jeff Law wrote:
> Certainly still useful, the trick is finding a hunk of that work that
> can be tackled via GSoc.
>
> jeff
Though I'm not participating in GSoC, I would be glad to get involved in
GCC development.
Could you please give some comments on current status of the fol
On 03/05/15 17:41, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
Hi!
On Thu, 5 Mar 2015 13:39:44 -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
On 02/23/15 14:41, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 4:00 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 12:56:06PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
On Tue, 23 Sep 2014 11:02:30 +, "Zam
On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 07:12:48PM +0300, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I've discovered a strange behaviour on trunk gcc, here is the reproducer:
>
> inline int foo ()
> {
> return 0;
> }
>
> int main ()
> {
> return foo ();
> }
>
> $ gcc main.c
> /tmp/ccD1LeXo.o: In function `main':
> m
On Fri, 6 Mar 2015, Ilya Verbin wrote:
I've discovered a strange behaviour on trunk gcc, here is the reproducer:
inline int foo ()
{
return 0;
}
int main ()
{
return foo ();
}
$ gcc main.c
/tmp/ccD1LeXo.o: In function `main':
main.c:(.text+0xa): undefined reference to `foo'
collect2: error:
Hi All,
I've discovered a strange behaviour on trunk gcc, here is the reproducer:
inline int foo ()
{
return 0;
}
int main ()
{
return foo ();
}
$ gcc main.c
/tmp/ccD1LeXo.o: In function `main':
main.c:(.text+0xa): undefined reference to `foo'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
Is
[...]
> This http://www.g-truc.net/post-0714.html great article explans better
> what SPIR-V is.
Another use-case that occurred to me when I was looking at the link you
posted above: using gcc for optimizing SPIR-V and compiling it e.g. to
CPU code.
As of gcc 5, libgccjit can be hooked up to a p
> I apologize. They got caught up in other issues. They've been merged into
> our mainstream and I believe they were just posted to the cilkplus.org
> website and submitted to GCC.
I'm going to submit latest cilk runtime sources next week so I will check the
mentioned change.
Thanks,
Igor
>
>
I apologize. They got caught up in other issues. They've been merged into our
mainstream and I believe they were just posted to the cilkplus.org website and
submitted to GCC.
- Barry
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Schwinge [mailto:tho...@codesourcery.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 5, 20
