On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 7:17 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 04:51:21PM -0500, David Edelsohn wrote:
>> GCC 4.8 branch has degraded from 14 libstdc++ failures to 153. This
>
> On which target, when it has been reported, are the libstdc++ folks aware of
> that?
> I see zero regr
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 04:51:21PM -0500, David Edelsohn wrote:
> GCC 4.8 branch has degraded from 14 libstdc++ failures to 153. This
On which target, when it has been reported, are the libstdc++ folks aware of
that?
I see zero regressions on x86_64-linux and i686-linux from a build 14 days
ago,
On 12 December 2014 at 23:38, Kendrick Hamilton wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I had an idea of a warning g++ might be able to add. The purpose of the
> warning is to help prevent bugs. The warning is to occur when you might
> destroy an inherited class using the base classes pointer. To illustrate
> conside
Hello,
I had an idea of a warning g++ might be able to add. The purpose of the
warning is to help prevent bugs. The warning is to occur when you might
destroy an inherited class using the base classes pointer. To illustrate
consider
class base
{
public:
base();
~base();
}
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 7:35 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Status
> ==
>
> The GCC 4.8.4-rc1 release candidate has been released.
> The branch is frozen now, all changes require release manager approval
> until the final release of GCC 4.8.4 which should happen roughly
> one week after the releas
Hi Bingfeng,
Thanks for commenting. It's reassuring to know that at least some ports
do not have the corresponding integer modes. I have now also understood
some of the background to the extra integer modes in ARM NEON and as
far as I can tell the integer modes represent an opaque view of the
regi
Status
==
The GCC 4.8.4-rc1 release candidate has been released.
The branch is frozen now, all changes require release manager approval
until the final release of GCC 4.8.4 which should happen roughly
one week after the release candidate.
Quality Data
Priority # Chan
The first release candidate for GCC 4.8.4 is available from
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.8.4-RC-20141212
and shortly its mirrors. It has been generated from SVN revision 218649.
I have so far bootstrapped and tested the release candidate on
x86_64-linux and i686-linux. Please test
Richard Biener wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 4:04 PM, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> > However, if we make that change, there will be some cases that regress: the
> > problem is that an expression "x + y" has *one* result type, and some things
> > you do with the result will require that type to match
I don't think it is required. For example, PowerPC port supports
V8SImode, but I don't see OImode. Just sometimes it could come handy to
have the equal size scalar mode.
Cheers,
Bingfeng
> -Original Message-
> From: gcc-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of
> Matt
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 4:04 PM, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 10:09 PM, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
>> > So at the very least, we should bring the documentation in line with the
>> > actual behavior. However, as seen above, that actual behavior is probably
>
11 matches
Mail list logo
