On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 3:54 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 8:38 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>
>> One way to optimize it is to make PLT entry to use the normal GOT
>> slot:
>>
>> jmp *name@GOTPCREL(%rip)
>> 8 byte nop
>>
>> where name@GOTPCREL points to the normal GOT slot
>> updated by R_
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 8:38 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>
> One way to optimize it is to make PLT entry to use the normal GOT
> slot:
>
> jmp *name@GOTPCREL(%rip)
> 8 byte nop
>
> where name@GOTPCREL points to the normal GOT slot
> updated by R_X86_64_GLOB_DAT relocation at run-time.
> Should I give it a
Snapshot gcc-4.9-20141119 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.9-20141119/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.9 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
Hello,
I write to inform you that unfortunately OnlineDirect (the sponsoring
company)
was acquired and the Igor machine will be stopped in the coming weeks.
Best regards,
Igor team
Submit a bug here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63970
Wei.
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 2:18 AM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 8:21 AM, Richard Biener
> wrote:
>> On November 19, 2014 8:13:09 AM CET, Wei Mi wrote:
>>>We see an inline problem as below caused by r201
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 6:14 AM, Michael Matz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 13 Nov 2014, H.J. Lu wrote:
>
>> Linker does:
>>
>> ... code that looks like it might create just one GOT slot ...
>>
>> So if a symbol is accessed by both @GOT and @PLTOFF, its
>> needs_plt will be true and its got.plt entry
On Nov 14, 2014, at 9:00 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 5:08 PM, David Edelsohn wrote:
>>I am pleased to announce that the GCC Steering Committee has
>> appointed Maxim Kuvyrkov as reviewer for the Android sub-port.
>>
>>Please join me in congratulating Maxim on hi
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 8:21 AM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On November 19, 2014 8:13:09 AM CET, Wei Mi wrote:
>>We see an inline problem as below caused by r201408
>>(https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-08/msg00027.html).
>>
>>hoo() {
>> foo();
>> ...
>>}
>>
>>foo {
>> goo();
>> ...
>>}
>>
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 10:04 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-11-18 at 10:53 +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 2:59 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
>> > On Mon, 2014-11-17 at 11:06 +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
>> >> On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 12:00 PM, David Malcolm
>> >> wr
