On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 2:53 AM, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Richard Biener
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 4:44 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni
>> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Richard Biener
>>> wrote:
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 12:16 AM, Prathamesh K
Snapshot gcc-4.10-20140810 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.10-20140810/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.10 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk
Should we CSE result-op (if result-op is not c_expr) ?
for example:
match-op1 -> result-op1
match-op2 -> result-op1
we generate code as:
match-op1
result-op1
match-op2
result-op1
instead generate:
match-op1
goto l1;
match-op2
goto l1;
l1:
result-op1
In general, for patterns.
match-o
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 4:44 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Richard Biener
>> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 12:16 AM, Prathamesh Kulkarni
>>> wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Prathamesh K
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 2:13 PM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 6:58 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 4:29 PM, Richard Biener
>> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 10:02 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni
>>> wrote:
I am having few issues replacing op in c_ex
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 11:07 PM, Alan Modra wrote:
> Both Fedora 19 and 20 have the patch needed for this to work. Hmm, I
> suppose the other thing necessary is a gcc that implements
> LDPT_GET_SYMBOLS_V2. You may be lacking that. Here's what I see with
> mainline gcc and ld.
It's been a while
