Hi Vlad
When I use ppc64 gcc4.9 to compile an internal application I got an
ICE due to an invalid instruction generated by reload.
Before IRA, I have following insns:
(insn 139 136 581 10 (set (reg:DI 567)
(const_int 0 [0])) ./strings/stringpiece.h:205 discrim 1 520
{*movdi_internal64}
I'll switch to replying on PR61538. I had not read all the ticket
previously and although I may have found a problem it seems it may not
be the cause of this failure.
The generated code differences after the patches seem significant but
I may not get chance to look at the differences in detail for
I am having few issues replacing op in c_expr.
I thought of following possibilities:
a) create a new vec vector new_code.
for each token in code
{
if token.type is not CPP_NAME
new_code.safe_push (token);
else
{
cpp_token new_token =
??? create new token of
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 10:05 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
> Hi,
> I was wondering if it would be a good idea to have the following syntax
> for literals:
> (type val) ?
> type would be one of the tree-codes representing cst types like
> INTEGER_CST, REAL_CST, etc.
>
> eg:
> (negate (integer
On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 11:20 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
> Hi,
>This patch adds support for outer-if expressions.
>
> Couple of issues:
> a) Doesn't interop with for-pattern, since we don't replace identifier
> in c-expr yet,
> and this gets more complicated with addition of outer-if.
Doe
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 9:13 AM, Thomas Mertes wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 12:35, Richard Biener
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Thomas Mertes wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jul 24 at 10:36 PM, Richard Biener
>> > wrote:
>> >> Fact is that if somebody is interested in
>> >> -ftrapv he
On 07/28/2014 04:41, Matthew Fortune wrote:
> Hi Joshua,
>
> I know very little about this area but I'll try and offer some advice
> anyway...
>
You know more than I do :)
>> On 07/05/2014 23:43, Joshua Kinard wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I filed PR61538 about two weeks ago, regarding gcc-4.8.x and
Hi Joshua,
I know very little about this area but I'll try and offer some advice anyway...
> On 07/05/2014 23:43, Joshua Kinard wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I filed PR61538 about two weeks ago, regarding gcc-4.8.x and up not
> > compiling a g++/pthreads-linked app correctly on SGI R1x000-based systems
