On 10 July 2014 07:31, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to get to the bottom of a bug when using the D front-end with
> -flto.
>
> When compiling anything, it always ICEs at in
> streamer_get_pickled_tree, at tree-streamer-in.c.
>
> The of it appears to be that the LTO frontend seems to ne
Hi,
I'm trying to get to the bottom of a bug when using the D front-end with -flto.
When compiling anything, it always ICEs at in
streamer_get_pickled_tree, at tree-streamer-in.c.
The of it appears to be that the LTO frontend seems to never retrieve
what it is expected to find. But I don't know
Hi,
I've noticed that the following targets are built in config-list.mk with
--enable-obsolete
i686-interix3 - doesn't appear to actually require --enable-obsolete
though, should it be marked as obsolete in config.gcc?
score-* and picochip-* since atleast sept 2012, is there a reason they
haven't
Snapshot gcc-4.9-20140709 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.9-20140709/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.9 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
On 09/07/14 08:59, Dagobert Michelsen wrote:
Hi,
I just noticed that on the page with the list for binary packages for
Solaris at
https://gcc.gnu.org/install/binaries.html
the distributions „Blastwave“ and „SunFreeware“ are still listed. Blastwave has
closed its doors some month ago and SunFr
On July 9, 2014 12:49:15 PM CEST, Bingfeng Mei wrote:
>Hi,
>I noticed recent GCC adds ivdep pragma support. We have our own
>implementation for ivdep for a couple of years now. As GCC
>implementation is much cleaner and we want to migrate to it. Ivdep is
>consumed in two places in our implementati
Dear all,
Do you have any results of GCC and LLVM performance comparisons of
different versions (for *ARM* architecture)?
It's not obvious question to find such comparisons in Web, since
Phoronix usually publishes comparisons for x86 and x86_64, and last
comparison for ARM was performed in 201
On 07/09/2014 02:17 AM, Tobias Burnus wrote:
Hello all,
I am trying to use BUILT_IN_ATOMIC_..., but it does not quite work. I
am calling them as:
tmp = builtin_decl_explicit (BUILT_IN_ATOMIC_LOAD_4);
tmp = build_call_expr_loc (input_location, tmp, 2, atom.expr, ...
That gives the followi
Hi,
I noticed recent GCC adds ivdep pragma support. We have our own implementation
for ivdep for a couple of years now. As GCC implementation is much cleaner and
we want to migrate to it. Ivdep is consumed in two places in our
implementation, one is tree-vect-data-refs.c used by vectorizer, the
Gerald Pfeifer writes:
> build/genmodes -h > tmp-modes.h
> build/genmodes: config/i386/i386-modes.def:25: (TF) field format must not be
> set
> build/genmodes: config/i386/i386-modes.def:24: (XF) field format must not be
> set
> build/genmodes: machmode.def:203: (DF) field format must not be se
Hi,
I just noticed that on the page with the list for binary packages for
Solaris at
https://gcc.gnu.org/install/binaries.html
the distributions „Blastwave“ and „SunFreeware“ are still listed. Blastwave has
closed its doors some month ago and SunFreeware has gone commercial (now
available
as un
12 matches
Mail list logo
