On 6/20/2014 1:46 PM, David Edelsohn wrote:
> On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 7:47 AM, Kirill Yukhin
> wrote:
>> Dear steering committee,
>>
>> To support the offloading features for Intel's Xeon Phi cards
>> we need to add a foreign library (liboffload) into the gcc repository.
>> README with b
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 7:47 AM, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
> Dear steering committee,
>
> To support the offloading features for Intel's Xeon Phi cards
> we need to add a foreign library (liboffload) into the gcc repository.
> README with build instructions is attached.
>
> I am also copy-pasti
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 5:01 AM, Bingfeng Mei wrote:
> As a short term solution, I tried some simple non-linear functions as Richard
> suggested
> to penalize using too many IVs. For example, the following cost in
> ivopts_global_cost_for_size fixed my regression and actually improves
> perform
Sorry, typo in previous mail.
"I also tried counting all SSA names and divide it by a factor. It does
NOT seem to work so well"
> -Original Message-
> From: Bin.Cheng [mailto:amker.ch...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 20 June 2014 10:19
> To: Bingfeng Mei
> Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: regs_us
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 5:01 PM, Bingfeng Mei wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Bin.Cheng [mailto:amker.ch...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: 20 June 2014 06:25
>> To: Bingfeng Mei
>> Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
>> Subject: Re: regs_used estimation in IVOPTS seriously flawed
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014
> -Original Message-
> From: Bin.Cheng [mailto:amker.ch...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 20 June 2014 06:25
> To: Bingfeng Mei
> Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: regs_used estimation in IVOPTS seriously flawed
>
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 10:59 PM, Bingfeng Mei wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I am looking at
