gcc-4.9-20140611 is now available

Snapshot gcc-4.9-20140611 is now available on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.9-20140611/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.9 SVN branch with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches

Re: [GSoC] decision tree first steps

On 6/11/14, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote: > On 6/11/14, Richard Biener wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Richard Biener >> wrote: >>> On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Richard Biener >>> wrote: On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 1:57 PM, Richard Biener wrote: > On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 a

Re: [GSoC] decision tree first steps

On 6/11/14, Richard Biener wrote: > On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Richard Biener > wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Richard Biener >> wrote: >>> On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 1:57 PM, Richard Biener >>> wrote: On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote: >

Re: [GSoC] decision tree first steps

On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Richard Biener wrote: > On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Richard Biener > wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 1:57 PM, Richard Biener >> wrote: >>> On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni >>> wrote: On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 7:18 PM, Richard Biene

ACM SIGPLAN Programming Languages Software Award

It gives me great pleasure to announce that GCC has won the ACM SIGPLAN Programming Languages Software Award Congratulations to the entire GCC Community! - David

RE: implicit gnat_malloc seen as vararg function

Hi, I have more info concerning my gnat_malloc problem. I watched the code in gcc/ada/gcc-interface/trans.c and found the location where malloc_decl tree is built. In gigi ()function (trans.c:411), the ftype for malloc_decl is done this way : ftype = build_function_type_list (ptr_void_type_no

Re: broken links?

On 06/10/2014 06:20 PM, Hebenstreit, Michael wrote: Either something is broken on my web-access or the links on https://gcc.gnu.org/install/prerequisites.html pointing to ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/infrastructure/ are gone - can't find the files anywhere else :( Thanks for all your efforts Mic

Re: [GSoC] decision tree first steps

On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Richard Biener wrote: > On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 1:57 PM, Richard Biener > wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni >> wrote: >>> On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 7:18 PM, Richard Biener >>> wrote: On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Richard Biener

Re: Best way to compute cost of a sequence of gimple stmt

On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Thomas Preud'homme wrote: >> From: Richard Biener [mailto:richard.guent...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2014 4:09 PM > >> > >> > Oh I see. Doing it there would mean instead of two independent >> > operations you'd do the best combination possible, is th

Re: [GSoC] decision tree first steps

On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 1:57 PM, Richard Biener wrote: > On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni > wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 7:18 PM, Richard Biener >> wrote: >>> On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Richard Biener >>> wrote: On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Prathamesh Kulk

RE: Best way to compute cost of a sequence of gimple stmt

> From: Richard Biener [mailto:richard.guent...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2014 4:09 PM > > > > Oh I see. Doing it there would mean instead of two independent > > operations you'd do the best combination possible, is that right? > > Yes (but probably it's not worth the trouble). I un

Re: Best way to compute cost of a sequence of gimple stmt

On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 7:45 AM, Thomas Preud'homme wrote: >> From: Richard Biener [mailto:richard.guent...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 5:16 PM >> > >> In general this is impossible to do. I don't have a good answer on >> how to determine whether (unaligned) load + bswap is faster