On 27/04/2014 21:52, Roman Gareev wrote:
Hi Tobias,
I'm considering the current code in graphite_clast_to_gimple.c, and
want to ask a few questions about it.
1. Where can I find the definitions of basic_block_def and edge from
coretypes.h?
gcc/basic-block.h
2. Why are recompute_all_domina
Hi Paolo!
On Sat, 26 Apr 2014 12:09:01 +0200, Paolo Leoni wrote:
> I'm a graduating Physics student from Italy. I'm actually working on
> accelerators devices like GPU and Intel MIC, with a focus on OpenACC
> api.
Are you primarily a user of OpenACC, or also interested in helping
implement it in
Snapshot gcc-4.10-20140427 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.10-20140427/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.10 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk
Hi!
On Sat, 2014-04-19 21:54:07 +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> I noticed that between 704db68e45..f2de45326 (209463..r209495),
> probbaly in e2ec52cad85e (r209484), building for arm-eabi breaks:
I oversaw this one for arc-elf:
g++ -c -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -DCROSS_DIRECTORY_STRUCTURE -fno-excep
I'm porting gcc to a 16 bit cpu with a two address ISA like x86.
When using LRA I was getting compiler crashes and results like
this from the reload pass
(insn 97 96 98 21 (parallel [
(set (reg/f:HI 3 r3 [59])
(plus:HI (reg/f:HI 6 sp)
(const_int
Hi Tobias,
I'm considering the current code in graphite_clast_to_gimple.c, and
want to ask a few questions about it.
1. Where can I find the definitions of basic_block_def and edge from
coretypes.h?
2. Why are recompute_all_dominators() and graphite_verify() called
before initialization of if_re
Hi Mircea.
Sorry, I've been missing for a while. Thank you for your ideas! I
agree that reusing of the existing code (especially code using
tree-SSA related information) is important for this project. I'm
considering the current code in graphite_clast_to_gimple.c, and want
to ask a few questions a
Sebastian Huber writes:
> Is it possible to add a search path to something and avoid this
> load_gcc_lib?
Just follow the numerous examples that get it right.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now fo
On 04/27/2014 03:25 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Sebastian Huber writes:
Since I am not an expert in the GCC test suite scripts, is it possible to
add such a test case at all with a moderate amount of work?
Just add load_gcc_lib gcc-defs.exp.
In libstdc++-v3/testsuite/lib/libstdc++.exp? In th
Sebastian Huber writes:
> Since I am not an expert in the GCC test suite scripts, is it possible to
> add such a test case at all with a moderate amount of work?
Just add load_gcc_lib gcc-defs.exp.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 175
Hallo,
I would like to add a test case to the libstdc++ tests to test for C/C++
compatibility of the atomic operations. A straight forward approach
like in the attached patch doesn't work since the
"dg-additional-sources" is not supported:
ERROR: 29_atomics/atomic/pr60932-c++.cc: unknown dg
11 matches
Mail list logo