Snapshot gcc-4.8-20140410 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.8-20140410/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.8 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
On Apr 11, 2014, at 2:47 AM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> On 10/04/14 02:50, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
>> On Apr 9, 2014, at 4:15 AM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I'm looking at some curious pre-reload scheduling behaviour and I noticed
>>> this:
>>>
>>> At the add_branch_dependences
On 04/10/2014 04:12 PM, Umesh Kalappa wrote:
> Please somebody from the group can share their thoughts and will be
> appricate the same.
But unoptimized code is expected to be large. Why do you expect
otherwise?
Andrew.
Hi there,
we ported gcc 4.8.1 to our ptivate target and the code is bloated for
the array access as shown below
C file :
int a[10];
int i;
test()
{
a[9] = 10;
a[i] = 20;
}
xgcc -O2 -S test.c
_test:
ld (_a+18), 10 ;a[9] = 10;
ld WA, (_i) ; a[i] = 20;
add WA
On 10/04/14 02:50, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
On Apr 9, 2014, at 4:15 AM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi all,
I'm looking at some curious pre-reload scheduling behaviour and I noticed this:
At the add_branch_dependences function sched-rgn.c there is a comment that says
"branches, calls, uses, clobbers
