On 03/22/14 05:38, Richard Hulme wrote:
Can you explain what is too weird about it in particular? It certainly
has restrictions on which registers can be used with various
instructions but I wouldn't have thought they were that complicated that
they couldn't be described using the normal constr
On 03/22/14 05:29, Richard Hulme wrote:
On 22/03/14 01:47, Jeff Law wrote:
On 03/21/14 18:35, DJ Delorie wrote:
I've found that "removing uneeded moves through registers" is
something gcc does poorly in the post-reload optimizers. I've written
my own on some occasions (for rl78 too). Perhaps
> From: Richard Sandiford [mailto:rdsandif...@googlemail.com]
>
> Yes. The configurations that support -mno-float have separate -mno-float
> multilibs. In a sense, the point of -mno-float instead of -msoft-float is
> to select these cut-down libraries.
IIRC, glibc loads some code on demand to a
Snapshot gcc-4.9-20140323 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.9-20140323/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.9 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk
On 22 March 2014 12:18, Klaus Rudolph wrote:
> I want to ask how I can find the bugs in bugzilla which are listed in
> the "Quality Data" Table. It feels that there are more bugs which are
> not listed. For example:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57694
That's a bug in 4.8 too, not a
Matthew Fortune writes:
> Maciej W. Rozycki writes:
>> On Sat, 22 Mar 2014, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>>
>> > > Thanks Joseph. I guess I'm not really pushing to have don't-care
>> > > supported as it would take a lot of effort to determine when code
>> > > does and does not care, you rightly poin
Maciej W. Rozycki writes:
> On Sat, 22 Mar 2014, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>
> > > Thanks Joseph. I guess I'm not really pushing to have don't-care
> > > supported as it would take a lot of effort to determine when code
> > > does and does not care, you rightly point out more cases to deal
> > > w
