Re: gimple_build_call for a class constructor

2014-01-29 Thread Stephan Friedl
I found my problem - I had forgotten about the cloned and generated constructors. For this case, there were 9 constructors generated - 3 sets of three with names of 'CTestClass', '__base_ctor' and '__comp_ctor'.  The first two sets of constructors took references as arguments, I'm assuming copy

RE: Enable debug info

2014-01-29 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
> -Original Message- > From: gcc-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of > Umesh Kalappa > Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2014 4:36 AM > To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org > Subject: Enable debug info > > Dear All, > > We need to support the debug info emit for our private port on

Re: A 404 error in gcc-4.8.2 onlinedocs

2014-01-29 Thread Gleb Smirnov
Hi Gerald, Thank you for fixing this. I'm glad to hear that a permanent workaround will be there in 4.8.3. Cheers, Gleb On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 4:27 AM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > Hi Gleb, > > On Sun, 26 Jan 2014, Gleb Smirnov wrote: >> I have been browsing the online docs here: >> http://gcc.gnu.

type promotion

2014-01-29 Thread Umesh Kalappa
Hi All, Was porting gcc 4.8.1 to the private target which has 8 bit regs and can be used as pair for 16bit like AB ,CD but not BC or AD. I was stuck in the type promotion like int i; unsigned char c; int test () { i =c; } defined the zero_extendqihi2 pattern for the above c construct lik

Re: Enable debug info

2014-01-29 Thread Andrew Haley
On 01/29/2014 09:36 AM, Umesh Kalappa wrote: > I was in impression using option -g in the commandline by defualt > ,will emit the dwarf debugging symbols and the info ,But i was wrong > here. It usually does. Andrew.

Enable debug info

2014-01-29 Thread Umesh Kalappa
Dear All, We need to support the debug info emit for our private port on gcc 4.8.1. I was in impression using option -g in the commandline by defualt ,will emit the dwarf debugging symbols and the info ,But i was wrong here. Anyone in the group point me some references or through some lights o

Re: VEC_WIDEN_MULT_(LO|HI)_EXPR vs. VEC_WIDEN_MULT_(EVEN|ODD)_EXPR in vectorization.

2014-01-29 Thread Richard Biener
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 4:17 PM, Bingfeng Mei wrote: > I checked vectorization code, it seems that only relevant place > vec_widen_mult_even/odd & vec_widen_mult_lo/hi are generated is in > supportable_widening_operation. One of these pairs is selected, with priority > given to vec_widen_mult_e